Federal contractor · NORWALK, CT

XEROX CORPORATION

XEROX CORPORATION received $814 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards. Since FY2017: $28.4M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($11.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$814
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
JB4NTVR9XMN4
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the XEROX CORPORATION company family: 49 registered entities, $66.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. XEROX CORPORATIONWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $43.9M
  2. XEROX CORPORATIONWEBSTER, NY
    $20.4M
  3. XEROX CORPORATIONCARY, NC
    $1.7M
  4. XEROX CORPCOPPELL, TX
    $582.7K
  5. XEROX GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRAENKTER HAFTUNGNEUSS, DEU
    $85.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.2MFY2017
  2. 545.5KFY2018
  3. 314.8KFY2019
  4. 2.8MFY2020
  5. 5.6MFY2021
  6. 5.8MFY2022
  7. 6.6MFY2023
  8. 2.2MFY2024
  9. -747.6KFY2025
  10. 814FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of State$11.8K100%
    2 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$8,741100%
    2 awards
  3. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$4,550100%
    1 awards
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs-$24.3K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11.6K57%
  2. IT & telecom$8,74143%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dallas County, TX$16.4K100%
  2. Orange County, FL$11.6K100%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$8,741100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$11.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$15.6K
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $4,550
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Acquisition Service$8,741
    General Services Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs-$24.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. XEROX MFD LEASE$47.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Muskogee County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Dec 29, 2022 – Jul 29, 2026· 36C25923P0219
  2. COPIER SERVICES FROM XEROX IN SUPPORT OF UNGA 6. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS: 14-25 SEPTEMBER 2021$14.4K
    Department of State· New York County, NY· Equipment maintenance· Jul 29, 2021 – Jul 16, 2026· 19AQMM21P0983
  3. COPIER RENTAL$11.9K
    Department of State· Dallas County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Jul 8, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 19AQMM26P0746
  4. ONE-TIME XEROX PRINT SERVICES$11.6K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Orange County, FL· Professional services· Sep 4, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026· 36C24826P1154
  5. XCIS XPAF LICENSE$8,741
    Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 47QACA26P0044
  6. XEROX XPAF LICENSE SUBSCRIPTION$8,741
    Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 14, 2025 – Jan 21, 2026· 47QACA25P0039
  7. F6 FY26 CORRECTIONAL SYSTEMS XEROX COPIER RENTAL$4,550
    Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Dallas County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· 15B10626P00000231

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $40K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CHUGACH SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE, LLC$40K100%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $87.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $40K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. AEROVIRONMENT, INC$2.8M
    SIMI VALLEY, CA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$1.5M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 71 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$536.8K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 38 subawards · Other telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 108 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SEILER INSTRUMENT AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INCORPORATED$49.7M−29% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 9.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A, INC.$21.7M−18% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 7 entities · 7.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingOffices, Boards and Divisions · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingArmy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing+5 more
  3. OPTEX SYSTEMS, INC$21.8M−42% in FY2026
    RICHARDSON, TX · 2 entities · 6.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of XEROX CORPORATION (49 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • XEROX CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • SRI InternationalAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$740K
10 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.9M
$3.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$10K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.9M
    14 reports
  2. 2024$1.2M
    12 reports
  3. 2025$740K
    10 reports
  4. 2026$80K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations38 reports
  2. Defense28 reports
  3. Science and technology6 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear2 reports
  6. Government issues2 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES39 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE39 reports
  3. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$530K
    16 reports
  2. National Group, LLP$170K
    15 reports
  3. Mr. Richard Goodstein$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$5,00050%
  2. Republican$5,00050%

PACs sponsored

  • XEROX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (XPAC)$3,320 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.