Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

YULISTA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC

YULISTA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC received $64.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 32 awards (−8.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $517.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($36.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$64.7M
New awards
32
Sole-source
2.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KMLFHN4MZH15
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $66.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. YULISTA SUPPORT SERVICES LLCHUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $64.7M
  2. YULISTA SERVICES, LLCHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $1.4M
  3. -$19.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.7MFY2019
  2. 47.1MFY2020
  3. 89.4MFY2021
  4. 75.2MFY2022
  5. 95.5MFY2023
  6. 67.5MFY2024
  7. 70.8MFY2025
  8. 64.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 19 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$36.3M56%
  2. Equipment maintenance$24M37%
  3. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$4.4M6.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.0%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards2.0%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Ocean County, NJ· Research & development· Apr 15, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· W56KGU24F0002
  2. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Aug 10, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· W56KGU23F0011
  3. Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 18, 2020 – May 29, 2026· N6133120C0018
  4. Department of the Army· Ocean County, NJ· Research & development· Feb 12, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· W56KGU25F0004
  5. Department of the Army· Ocean County, NJ· Research & development· Feb 9, 2022 – Feb 6, 2026· W56KGU22F0001
  6. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Apr 27, 2021 – Apr 7, 2026· W56KGU21F0004
  7. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Apr 30, 2021 – May 5, 2026· FA489021F0038
  8. Department of the Army· Ocean County, NJ· Research & development· Mar 2, 2023 – Jun 11, 2026· W56KGU23F0001

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.9M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Other support services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JC TECHNOLOGY INC$113.8M−58% in FY2026
    DES PLAINES, IL · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. APRO INTERNATIONAL, INC$56.1M+5.5% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  3. PERGRAVIS LLC$65.5M−19% in FY2026
    TAMPA, FL · 2 entities · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.