Federal contractor · ANNAPOLIS, MD

AARCHER, INC.

AARCHER, INC. received $733.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 42 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.2M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($421.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$733.8K
New awards
42
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
33%
UEI
XABSDSWBWKH1
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 2.4MFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 2MFY2021
  6. 2.4MFY2022
  7. 2.4MFY2023
  8. 2.2MFY2024
  9. 1.5MFY2025
  10. 733.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 32 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. Forest Service$2,7500.4%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$462.1K63%
  2. Facilities & utilities$221.4K30%
  3. Education & social services$50.2K6.8%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition33%
    US 39% · $238.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions33%
    US 8.8% · $238.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Anne Arundel County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2023 – Aug 18, 2026· 140P2123F0195
  2. National Park Service· Alamosa County, CO· Professional services· Sep 18, 2024 – Jan 27, 2026· 140P2024F0355
  3. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 16, 2021 – Jun 25, 2026· 140P2021F0321
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Professional services· Sep 2, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 140L3726P0115
  5. National Park Service· Anne Arundel County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2025 – Sep 21, 2026· 140P1225F0039
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 8, 2023 – Mar 25, 2026· 140L0623F0221
  7. Bureau of Land Management· Custer County, MT· Professional services· Jun 30, 2025 – Jul 1, 2026· 140L0625F0066
  8. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 6, 2023 – Jul 7, 2026· 140L0623F0156

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $84K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $84K reported

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CRITIGEN LLC$2.8M−68% in FY2026
    GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesDepartmental Offices · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. ABR, INC.$5M−15% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Support activities for forestryNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. SWCA, INCORPORATED$6.6M−6.6% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 8 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.