Federal contractor · GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
CRITIGEN LLC
CRITIGEN LLC received $327.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($372.3K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $327.5K
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JFKUGGSLBZN6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 852.4KFY2017
- 54.3KFY2018
- 17.8KFY2019
- -207.1FY2020
- 713.9KFY2021
- 1.2MFY2022
- 1.4MFY2023
- 1.4MFY2024
- 1MFY2025
- 327.5KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Bureau of Land Management$372.3K100%3 awards
- Departmental Offices-$44.8K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$327.5K100%
Where the work was performed
- Multnomah County, OR$168.3K51%
- Arapahoe County, CO$110.2K34%
- Jefferson County, CO$49K15%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 1, 2021 – Sep 24, 2026· 140L0621F0294
- Departmental Offices· Arapahoe County, CO· Professional services· Sep 16, 2022 – Jan 9, 2026· 140D0422F0910
- Bureau of Land Management· Multnomah County, OR· Professional services· Aug 24, 2022 – Jun 23, 2026· 140L0622F0176
- GIS SPECIALIST$722.9KBureau of Land Management· Arapahoe County, CO· Professional services· Sep 8, 2022 – Sep 9, 2026· 140L0622F0243
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $192.2K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $479.1K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $237.1K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $2.2M reported
- SIGNIFICANCE INC$1.5MANNAPOLIS, MD · 7 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- AARCHER, INC.$4.4M−51% in FY2026ANNAPOLIS, MD · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesDepartmental Offices · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ABR, INC.$5M−15% in FY2026FAIRBANKS, AK · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ANABRANCH SOLUTIONS, LLC$1M−100% in FY2026NEWTON, UT · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.