Federal contractor · FRAMINGHAM, MA

AMERESCO SELECT, INC.

AMERESCO SELECT, INC. received $17.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−12% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $334.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($7.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$17.4M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
M94SPPKPU233
Parent company
AMERESCO INC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AMERESCO INC company family: 4 registered entities, $314.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AMERESCO INCFRAMINGHAM, MA · Family page
    $296.9M
  2. $203.5K
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 32.3MFY2017
  2. 84.1MFY2018
  3. 39.2MFY2019
  4. 35.3MFY2020
  5. 38.2MFY2021
  6. 24.9MFY2022
  7. 24.7MFY2023
  8. 18.5MFY2024
  9. 19.8MFY2025
  10. 17.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$13.4M77%
  2. Construction & real property$4M23%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Prince William County, VA· Professional services· Dec 12, 2016 – Nov 24, 2025· N4740802F4965
  2. Department of the Air Force· Burlington County, NJ· Professional services· May 17, 2017 – Jun 11, 2026· FA448410F0001
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Accomack County, VA· Construction & real property· Sep 7, 2017 – Sep 24, 2026· NNG10AZ01D

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $18.1M reported

  1. MOUNT AIRY, MD · 1 subaward
  2. BELTSVILLE, MD · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1M reported

  1. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT$805.6K
    COLUMBUS, OH · 9 subawards
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. CAPE CANAVERAL, FL · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORESCO, LLC$279.8M+30% in FY2026
    WESTBOROUGH, MA · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Logistics Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services+4 more
  2. CEG SOLUTIONS LLC$200.4M−89% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MILWAUKEE, WI · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AMERESCO INC (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AmerescoAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$720K
19 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.1M
$2.1M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$460K
    26 reports
  2. 2024$350K
    20 reports
  3. 2025$720K
    19 reports
  4. 2026$520K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code60 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear44 reports
  3. Environment and Superfund28 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  5. Defense14 reports
  6. Government issues2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES56 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE51 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BGR Government Affairs$520K
    5 reports
  2. ARDEIDAE GROUP LLC$400K
    14 reports
  3. Strategic Marketing Innovations$305K
    14 reports
  4. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$180K
    5 reports
  5. AxAdvocacy Government Relations$80K
    2 reports
  6. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough$70K
    8 reports
  7. Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$20K
    9 reports
  8. Capitol City Group, Ltd.$0
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.