Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT

AMERICAN PACIFIC CORPORATION

AMERICAN PACIFIC CORPORATION received $264.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($264.5K).

Obligations · FY2026: $264.5K
New awards: 2
Sole-source: 100%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: VPQXQU2PUUB6
Parent company: G. S. PRECISION, INC.

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C. company family: 4 registered entities, $64.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C.WASHINGTON, DC · Family page
Reported parent$64.1M
RESOLUTE INDUSTRIAL LLCWHEELING, IL
Reported parent$455.1K
SAN DIEGO COMPOSITES, INCSAN DIEGO, CA
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

136.2KFY2017
217.2KFY2018
376.2KFY2019
992.8KFY2020
91.5KFY2023
1.6MFY2024
239.1KFY2025
264.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Navy$264.5K100%
2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Other equipment & supplies$141.8K54%
Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$122.7K46%

Where the work was performed

Iron County, UT$264.5K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $264.5K
Sole-source awards100%
US 30% · $264.5K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.7% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Navy$264.5K
Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

AMMONIUM PERCHLORATE$141.8K
Department of the Navy· Iron County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 14, 2026· N6893626P5082
OPTION YEAR 1 DELIVERY ORDER$122.7K
Department of the Navy· Iron County, UT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· N0017426F1029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

FY2021: $0 paid out · $24.5M received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $9.2M received
FY2023: $0 paid out · $17M received
FY2024: $0 paid out · $10.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

50 companies · $111.5M reported

INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT CORP.$32.1M
GREENBELT, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
MUSTANG TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$18.3M
FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
SPECTRO ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.$10.6M
WILMINGTON, MA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

27 companies · $128.7M reported

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$62.1M
MELBOURNE, FL · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$15.4M
SPARKS, NV · 2 subawards
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$11.3M
FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$367M−60% in FY2026
LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
HONOLULU, HI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C. (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

AMERICAN PACIFIC CORP.AI match · 92%

Lobbying · 2025: $280K; 16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $850K

Lobbying by year

2023$280K
16 reports
2024$270K
16 reports
2025$280K
16 reports
2026$20K
6 reports

Top issues

Environment and Superfund32 reports
Defense10 reports
Accounting1 reports
Advertising1 reports
Foreign relations1 reports

Who was contacted

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)33 reports
U.S. SENATE22 reports
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES20 reports
State - Dept of (DOS)15 reports
Defense - Dept of (DOD)14 reports
Executive Office of the President (EOP)14 reports
Natl Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$710K
12 reports
Alcalde & Fay$140K
14 reports
Policy Navigation Group$0
14 reports

4 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 8070 · Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20252 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2024
S. 2296 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 2670 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20241 report
118th Congress · Became law · 2023
S. 2226 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20241 report
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2023
S. 4638 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20251 report
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2024

5 of 54 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.