Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

APPLIED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

APPLIED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. received $920K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $4.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($699.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$920K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
33%
UEI
NWX8SNSYTE66
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1MFY2023
  2. 99.9KFY2024
  3. 2.3MFY2025
  4. 920KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$920K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition33%
    US 39% · $300K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions33%
    US 8.8% · $300K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 18, 2023 – Dec 5, 2025· N6426723C0051
  2. Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Apr 28, 2025 – Feb 10, 2026· N6426725C7030
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 80NSSC26C0207
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 4, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE506

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $311.7K received
  • FY2024: $579.2K paid out · $11.6M received
  • FY2025: $805.1K paid out · $1.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $1.4M reported

  1. SIMI VALLEY, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. WASHINGTON, IL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $13.1M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NU-TREK, INC.$3.3M−71% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. HYPERKELP INC$2.9M−100% in FY2026
    ENCINITAS, CA · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, INC$3.3M−57% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.