Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC

INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC received $32.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $537M. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($25.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$32.3M
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
8.4%
UEI
VKJRFGZ6NVP4
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 28.2MFY2017
  2. 36.8MFY2018
  3. 82.4MFY2019
  4. 84.1MFY2020
  5. 61.7MFY2021
  6. 62.6MFY2022
  7. 21.7MFY2023
  8. 70.6MFY2024
  9. 56.6MFY2025
  10. 32.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Missile Defense Agency$25.5M79%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$6M19%
    7 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$639.9K2.0%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Army$105.6K0.3%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$30.5M94%
  2. Professional services$1.7M5.4%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$81.4K0.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$31.2M97%
  2. Kern County, CA$639.9K2.0%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$409.6K1.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition8.4%
    US 39% · $2.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions8.4%
    US 8.8% · $2.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE CORE OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT TASK ORDER IS FOCUSED ON PROVIDING KEY SERVICES TO RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION DURING FLIGHT TESTS, GROUND TESTS, CYBER TESTS, AND OTHER RELATED DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.$36.4M
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 22, 2025 – Jun 8, 2026· HQ085825FE005
  2. TASK ORDER FOR INTERNATIONAL APACHE TECHNICAL LIFECYCLE SUPPORT.$28.5M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jun 4, 2018 – Jun 3, 2026· 0001
  3. RRL FY24 CONTENT CONVERSION AVIATION RATINGS DELIVERY ORDER 1$19.3M
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 7, 2024 – Mar 31, 2026· N6134024F0045
  4. PR 57-6025-17 -- RDT&E SUPPORT FOR TACTICAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SIMULATION NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY$14.1M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· May 23, 2017 – May 11, 2026· N0017317F2055
  5. RRL FY24 CONTENT CONVERSION AVIATION RATINGS DELIVERY ORDER 5, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING COURSEWARE.$9.4M
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 29, 2024 – May 26, 2026· N6134024F0120
  6. LABOR$9.4M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Jun 30, 2023 – Dec 3, 2025· N0017323F2036
  7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE FLIGHT CREW OPERATIONS OF ALL AIRCRAFT ASSIGNED TO NASA AFRC$7.1M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Dec 20, 2023 – Sep 23, 2026· 80AFRC24F0005
  8. NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY (NRL) RDTE SUPPORT FOR TACTICAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SIMULATION (TEWS)$3.7M
    Department of the Navy· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – May 6, 2026· N0017326F2402

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.8M (7 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. THE COE GROUP LLC$828.9K46%
    ORLANDO, FL · 2 subawards
  2. BLUEDROP USA INC.$523.2K29%
    ORLANDO, FL · 4 subawards
  3. C2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$438K24%
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: -$71.57 (1 subaward)

1 prime

Its reported sub-contracts equal 5.5% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $123.9M paid out · $159M received
  • FY2022: $651.8M paid out · $121.7M received
  • FY2023: $424.7M paid out · $35.8M received
  • FY2024: $201.9M paid out · $30.4M received
  • FY2025: $31.9M paid out · $9.4M received
  • FY2026: $1.8M paid out · -$71.57 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

104 companies · $1.4B reported

  1. TEKTONUX LLC$264.8M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 16 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.$229.9M
    MARIETTA, GA · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC$208.1M
    PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

21 companies · $356.3M reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$140.1M
    RESTON, VA · 15 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$104.9M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 205 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ACCELINT AI, LLC$24.6M
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 3 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JRC INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC$105.4M−11% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Business schools and computer and management training+1 more
  2. EAGLE SYSTEMS INC$99.8M−16% in FY2026
    CALIFORNIA, MD · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. CYDECOR INC.$97.8M−44% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • INTEGRATION INNOVATION, INC.AI match · 100%
PAC giving · 2026
$6,500
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$6,500100%

PACs sponsored

  • INTEGRATION INNOVATION, INC. PAC$20K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.