Federal contractor · FAIRBORN, OH

PEERLESS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

PEERLESS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION received $13.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $484.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($10.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.8M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
34%
UEI
GM4JDCJEW5Z7
Other than small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 32.9MFY2017
  2. 44.1MFY2018
  3. 65.4MFY2019
  4. 66.8MFY2020
  5. 57.9MFY2021
  6. 57.8MFY2022
  7. 49.3MFY2023
  8. 42.8MFY2024
  9. 53.5MFY2025
  10. 13.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$10.3M75%
    6 awards
  2. Department of the Army$2M15%
    1 awards
  3. Federal Acquisition Service$1.5M11%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Navy-$18.1K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$13.7M99%
  2. Research & development$139.8K1.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Greene County, OH$10.8M78%
  2. King George County, VA$2M15%
  3. Bexar County, TX$1.6M12%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition34%
    US 39% · $4.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions34%
    US 8.8% · $4.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT$53.2M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Apr 18, 2019 – Jul 23, 2026· 47QFLA19F0076
  2. SCAT I ENGINEERING, PROFESSIONAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES$39.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Jul 3, 2025 – May 20, 2026· FA862225FB004
  3. MODELING&SIMULATION SOFTWARE (M&S)DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION&SUSTAINMENT(DOS)$38.5M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Aug 20, 2018 – Feb 18, 2026· FA942218F6019
  4. BUSINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES$27.6M
    Department of the Navy· Martin County, IN· Professional services· May 3, 2017 – Dec 8, 2025· N0016417F3004
  5. ADVISORY NS ASSISTANCE SERVICES/ONE ACQUISITION SOLUTION FOR INTEGRATED SERVICES;AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER/ ENERGY DIRECTORATE SUPPORT SERVICES$25.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Apr 3, 2019 – May 20, 2026· FA890319F0126
  6. GRAVITY SUSTAINMENT AND SERVICE SUPPORT (GS3)$13.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· Mar 11, 2019 – Mar 23, 2026· FA942219F5003
  7. THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DATA ANALYSIS, ALGORITHM AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE EVALUATION OF DISRUPTION EFFECTS ON ADVERSARY CAPABILITIES AND NETWORKS TO THE GOVERNMENT.$5.7M
    Department of the Army· King George County, VA· Professional services· Apr 1, 2025 – Apr 9, 2026· W15P7T25F0093
  8. PROCURE, INTEGRATE, TEST THIRD PARTY APPS WITH VENDOR A ON A DATALINK AND INTEGRATION OF SOSA SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO (SDR) WITH MATERIAL OF THREE SDR/EA., AND FIELD TEST SUPPORT.$1.5M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· FA703726F0043

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.3M (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$1.6M36%
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward
  2. RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.5M35%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards
  3. ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$1.3M29%
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $5.2M paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $30.5M received
  • FY2024: $5.6M paid out · $546.3K received
  • FY2025: $39.2M paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $50M reported

  1. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$19M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. KBR SERVICES, LLC$11.3M
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. SERCO INC$7M
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $43.7M reported

  1. BQMI-PEERLESS JOINT VENTURE LLC$27.2M
    CLEVELAND, OH · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KBR SERVICES, LLC$3.9M
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. BANNER QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC$3.3M
    FRIENDSWOOD, TX · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AXIENT LLC$104.2M−40% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC$97.5M−38% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 2 entities · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MCR FEDERAL, LLC$93.6M−43% in FY2026
    MCLEAN, VA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Peerless TechnologiesAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2026
$60K
2 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2026$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Computer industry2 reports
  2. Government issues2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. FIDELITY STRATEGIES$60K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.