Federal contractor · MAPLE GROVE, MN

CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIAL METROLOGY, LLC

CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIAL METROLOGY, LLC received $44.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−50% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($44.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$44.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
N1K1BHREQNJ1
Parent company
CARL-ZEISS-STIFTUNG
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIAL METROLOGY, LLCMAPLE GROVE, MN · Family page
    $44.6K
  2. $1.6M
  3. $0
  4. -$20.6K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 388.5KFY2017
  2. 880.6KFY2018
  3. 2.1MFY2019
  4. 1.4MFY2020
  5. 161.7KFY2021
  6. 755.3KFY2022
  7. 224.2KFY2023
  8. 66.7KFY2024
  9. 89KFY2025
  10. 44.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$44.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $44.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $44.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 20, 2022 – Mar 2, 2026· FA812622P0064

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $38.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $80.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $15.5M reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 8 subawards · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 20 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 23 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SPIRENT FEDERAL SYSTEMS INC$8.5M+21% in FY2026
    PLEASANT GROVE, UT · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+7 more
  2. EDAX, LLC$1.2M−100% in FY2026
    PLEASANTON, CA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance+4 more
  3. BRUKER AXS LLC$7M+56% in FY2026
    FITCHBURG, WI · 6 entities · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIAL METROLOGY, LLC (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CARL ZEISS, INC.AI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2026
$110K
5 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2026$110K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Trade (domestic and foreign)4 reports
  2. Science and technology3 reports
  3. Health issues1 reports
  4. Manufacturing1 reports
  5. Waste (hazardous, solid, interstate, nuclear)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. FGS Global (US) LLC (FKA FGH Holdings LLC)$40K
    2 reports
  2. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$20K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.