Federal contractor · PLEASANT GROVE, UT

SPIRENT FEDERAL SYSTEMS INC

SPIRENT FEDERAL SYSTEMS INC received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $39.8M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2M
New awards
7
Sole-source
92%
Single offer
3.8%
UEI
FDNGCFYJB5J7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.8MFY2017
  2. 7.7MFY2018
  3. 7.7MFY2019
  4. 2.8MFY2020
  5. 1.2MFY2021
  6. 1.4MFY2022
  7. 4.7MFY2023
  8. 4.9MFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.5M74%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$224K11%
  3. Research & development$180.6K9.0%
  4. Professional services$76K3.8%
  5. Equipment maintenance$46K2.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition96%
    US 39% · $1.9M
  • Sole-source awards92%
    US 30% · $1.9M
  • Single-offer competitions3.8%
    US 8.7% · $76K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 24, 2024 – Oct 29, 2025· 70Z04424CESD50001
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· IT & telecom· Jan 29, 2026 – Feb 6, 2026· 80MSFC26P0002
  3. Department of the Army· Utah County, UT· Research & development· Feb 21, 2023 – Feb 12, 2026· W56KGU23P0001
  4. Department of the Air Force· Utah County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 26, 2024 – Dec 1, 2025· FA910125PB012
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Utah County, UT· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2025 – May 20, 2026· 80NSSC25PC030
  6. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· May 24, 2024 – May 7, 2026· N0018924P0293
  7. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· N6893626P5159

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.5M (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward
  2. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $32M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 36 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 28 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 18 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAPLE GROVE, MN · 4 entities · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+7 more
  2. LA POBLA DE VALLBONA, ESP · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. EXAIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.$2.2M−50% in FY2026
    LINCOLN, RI · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.