Federal contractor · MADISON, WI

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. received $4.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 122 awards (+77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $450.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($3.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.3M
New awards
122
Sole-source
16%
Single offer
3.1%
UEI
NDZNF9EW7NP7
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY company family: 71 registered entities, $2.3B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYLYNN, MA · Family page
    $1.4B
  2. $636.3M
  3. $69.4M
  4. GE RENEWABLES US LLCGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
    $69.2M
  5. GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLCGRAND RAPIDS, MI
    $36.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.3MFY2017
  2. 3.9MFY2018
  3. 2.5MFY2019
  4. 409.2MFY2020
  5. 9.8MFY2021
  6. 3.5MFY2022
  7. 3.6MFY2023
  8. 3.2MFY2024
  9. 2.5MFY2025
  10. 4.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 18 awards
  2. 95 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$3.7M86%
  2. Equipment maintenance$621.7K14%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bell County, TX$92.5K2.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition19%
    US 39% · $834.7K
  • Sole-source awards16%
    US 30% · $701.8K
  • Single-offer competitions3.1%
    US 8.7% · $132.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$0.05

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 2 awards
  2. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dane County, WI· Health & medical· Sep 6, 2026 – Sep 6, 2026· 36C24526F0386
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Davidson County, TN· Equipment maintenance· Sep 14, 2022 – Aug 26, 2026· 36C24922C0122
  3. Indian Health Service· Navajo County, AZ· Health & medical· Aug 30, 2022 – Jul 20, 2026· 75H71222C00023
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dane County, WI· Health & medical· Jan 12, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· 36C25023F0321
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2019 – Feb 19, 2026· 36C26220C0009
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Clark County, NV· Equipment maintenance· Jan 24, 2022 – Jun 21, 2026· 36C26122P0242
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Richmond city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Dec 9, 2021 – Jul 27, 2026· 36C24622P0354
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2024 – May 20, 2026· 36C26225C0013

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

506 companies · $1.7B reported

  1. YORK, PA · 22 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. VALENCIA, CA · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. IRVINE, CA · 57 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

99 companies · $2.4B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1,720 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 296 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 72 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 95 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE$3.6B−0.6% in FY2026
    AMARILLO, TX · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION$3.5B−27% in FY2026
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 29 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+2 more
  3. POWAY, CA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (71 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYAI match · 98%
  • Innoveering, LLCAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$644K
19 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.9M
PAC giving · 2026
$369.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.3M
    41 reports
  2. 2024$734.7K
    31 reports
  3. 2025$644K
    19 reports
  4. 2026$222K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense74 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations53 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code28 reports
  4. Transportation17 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear15 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines14 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)10 reports
  8. Aerospace8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE82 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES77 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$560K
    14 reports
  2. Harbinger Strategies, LLC$460K
    6 reports
  3. Avoq, LLC$420K
    7 reports
  4. Miller Strategies, LLC$380K
    14 reports
  5. Strategic Marketing Innovations$370K
    9 reports
  6. HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC$295K
    13 reports
  7. Cardinal Point Partners$130K
    11 reports
  8. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$100K
    4 reports

12 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$242K65%
  2. Democratic$127.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AEROSPACE EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GE AEROSPACE PAC)$867.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.