Federal contractor · POWAY, CA

GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. received $1.8B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 136 awards (+7.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $20.6B. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($734.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8B
New awards
136
Sole-source
99%
Single offer
1.1%
UEI
ZH4NVFG3Z526
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3BFY2017
  2. 2.2BFY2018
  3. 2.8BFY2019
  4. 1.9BFY2020
  5. 2BFY2021
  6. 1.9BFY2022
  7. 1.8BFY2023
  8. 2.3BFY2024
  9. 1.6BFY2025
  10. 1.8BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 65 awards
  3. 38 awards
  4. 10 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 6 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.1B64%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$576.6M33%
  3. Research & development$38.1M2.2%
  4. Equipment maintenance$10.1M0.6%
  5. Construction & real property$6M0.3%
  6. Education & social services$311.6K0.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $1.8B
  • Sole-source awards99%
    US 30% · $1.7B
  • Single-offer competitions1.1%
    US 8.7% · $20.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 8 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 7 awards
  3. Department of Transportation · 1 awards
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 19, 2019 – Dec 11, 2025· W58RGZ19C0027
  2. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Mar 29, 2022 – Sep 25, 2026· 70B02C22C00000016
  3. Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 18, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W58RGZ24C0031
  4. Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Dec 18, 2023 – Apr 29, 2026· FA857724C0001
  5. Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Dec 17, 2021 – May 4, 2026· FA857722C0001
  6. Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 27, 2023 – May 12, 2026· FA868923C2018
  7. Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 8, 2025 – Apr 2, 2026· FA868925FB010
  8. Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 1, 2023 – Jun 10, 2026· W58RGZ24C0021

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$423.5K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 423.5KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2023.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $82.8M (202 subawards)

89 sub-recipients

  1. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 11 subawards
  2. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 3 subawards
  3. PHOENIX, AZ · 35 subawards
  4. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  5. ASHBURN, VA · 13 subawards
  6. CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 2 subawards
  7. SHIFT5, INC.$2.4M2.9%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  8. JOPLIN, MO · 6 subawards
  9. PHOENIX, AZ · 5 subawards
  10. POWAY, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $36.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. LEXINGTON, KY · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 4.7% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $299.1M paid out · $81.2M received
  • FY2022: $148.8M paid out · $16.9M received
  • FY2023: $152.7M paid out · $19.3M received
  • FY2024: $214.1M paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2025: $169M paid out · $11.4M received
  • FY2026: $82.8M paid out · $36.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

309 companies · $1.1B reported

  1. GREENVILLE, TX · 140 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 447 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 42 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $131.6M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. HOLLYWOOD, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 20 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS$1.6B−48% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY$8.5B−29% in FY2026
    LYNN, MA · 71 entities · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.1M
31 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.6M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$770K
    24 reports
  2. 2024$1M
    28 reports
  3. 2025$1.1M
    31 reports
  4. 2026$700K
    17 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations71 reports
  2. Defense71 reports
  3. Foreign relations14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE94 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES81 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Thorn Run Partners$880K
    14 reports
  2. S-3 Group$720K
    14 reports
  3. Liz Williams and Company$600K
    15 reports
  4. SB Strategic Consulting, Inc.$420K
    14 reports
  5. FifeStrategies, LLC$380K
    14 reports
  6. Icebreaker Strategies, LLC$200K
    4 reports
  7. Tidal Strategies, LLC$190K
    10 reports
  8. The Dionne Company$120K
    6 reports

9 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.