Federal contractor · FREMONT, CA

DB CONTROL

DB CONTROL received $764.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $25.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($764.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$764.7K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NCG7W2K7P7R6
Parent company
HEICO CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ROBERTSON FUEL SYSTEMS, L.L.C. company family: 45 registered entities, $111.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ROBERTSON FUEL SYSTEMS, L.L.C.TEMPE, AZ · Family page
    $68.4M
  2. SEAL DYNAMICS LLCHAUPPAUGE, NY
    $32M
  3. $2.2M
  4. $1.3M
  5. $1.3M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.1MFY2017
  2. 4.3MFY2018
  3. 3MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 801.2KFY2021
  6. 5.2MFY2022
  7. -386KFY2023
  8. 5.9MFY2024
  9. 467.9KFY2025
  10. 764.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$764.7K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· SPRMM126PKB01

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $31.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. POWAY, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $7.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $866.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $848.3K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $12M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $31.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

57 companies · $562.6M reported

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 116 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 451 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 131 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 104 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRIUMPH ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS LLC$209.9M−26% in FY2026
    WEST HARTFORD, CT · 16 entities · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+3 more
  2. WOODWARD HRT INC$314M−20% in FY2026
    VALENCIA, CA · 7 entities · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+8 more
  3. ECI DEFENSE GROUP, INC.$295M−16% in FY2026
    LAWRENCEVILLE, GA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing+11 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.