Federal contractor · MISSOULA, MT

DJ&A, P.C.

DJ&A, P.C. received $12.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 126 awards (+29% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $141.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($7.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12.7M
New awards
126
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
54%
UEI
ET9MWK3PM4U6
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.2MFY2017
  2. 5.4MFY2018
  3. 11.5MFY2019
  4. 9.1MFY2020
  5. 21.7MFY2021
  6. 24.1MFY2022
  7. 20.7MFY2023
  8. 21.2MFY2024
  9. 9.8MFY2025
  10. 12.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Highway Administration$7.7M60%
    56 awards
  2. National Park Service$3M24%
    35 awards
  3. Forest Service$783K6.2%
    28 awards
  4. Bureau of Land Management$746.2K5.9%
    3 awards
  5. Bureau of Reclamation$420.4K3.3%
    1 awards
  6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$48.1K0.4%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$12.2M96%
  2. Facilities & utilities$468.6K3.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Missoula County, MT$8M63%
  2. Taos County, NM$1.3M10%
  3. Elko County, NV$468.6K3.7%
  4. Yakima County, WA$420.4K3.3%
  5. Tulare County, CA$384.1K3.0%
  6. Solano County, CA$364.4K2.9%
  7. Eddy County, NM$346K2.7%
  8. Clallam County, WA$313.9K2.5%
  9. Chaves County, NM$275.1K2.2%
  10. Riverside County, CA$186.4K1.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition54%
    US 39% · $6.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions54%
    US 8.7% · $6.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$39.8K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. HI STP 360 HANA HIGHWAY BRIDGES DESIGN SERVICES TO COMPLETE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FROM 30% DESIGN TO FINAL DESIGN, INCLUDING ROW, NEPA, DESIGN, ETC$3.2M
    Federal Highway Administration· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Dec 2, 2020 – Mar 20, 2026· 6982AF21F000008
  2. PRE-DESIGN (PD) AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN (SD) DOCUMENTS, REHABILITATE WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AT FURNACE CREEK AND COW CREEK, DEVA 318717$2.9M
    National Park Service· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Apr 29, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· 140P2022F0033
  3. UT FLAP SLA 10(1) MILL CREEK CANYON ROAD 6982AF19D000006/6982AF20F000109 SCOPING TASK ORDER$2.1M
    Federal Highway Administration· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 10, 2020 – Mar 20, 2026· 6982AF20F000109
  4. DESIGN SERVICES FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES, REHAB COW CREEK & FURNACE CREEK WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS, DEVA 318717$1.7M
    National Park Service· Inyo County, CA· Construction & real property· May 11, 2023 – Jun 16, 2026· 140P2023F0200
  5. NV FLAP 500(2) RED ROCK TRAIL$1.4M
    Federal Highway Administration· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2021 – May 12, 2026· 6982AF21F000149
  6. DEVA 318717 - TITLE III SERVICES, REF. PROJECT - REHABILITATE WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AT FURNACE CREEK & COW CREEK AREAS.$1.4M
    National Park Service· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 140P2026F0188
  7. 6982AF19D000006/6982AF22F000067 CA FLAP MON T10(1) FORT ORD NM TRAIL SCOPING SERVICES$1.3M
    Federal Highway Administration· Missoula County, MT· Construction & real property· Apr 15, 2022 – Mar 20, 2026· 6982AF22F000067
  8. NM FS SNTFE310 263(1) GALLINAS CANYON ROAD SCOPING AND PREPARE CONCEPT LEVEL PLAN SHEET$1.3M
    Federal Highway Administration· Taos County, NM· Construction & real property· Jan 6, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 6982AF26F00017N

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $79.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.$79.1K100%
    DENVER, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $76K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $360.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $239.6K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $79.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $755.2K reported

  1. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$706.4K
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SEVEN GENERATIONS ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING LLC$48.8K
    KALAMAZOO, MI · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC$16.2M−64% in FY2026
    GOLDEN, CO · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DHM DESIGN CORPORATION$17.6M+61% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CROFT AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$13.8M−61% in FY2026
    KENNESAW, GA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.