Federal contractor · DENVER, CO

HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

HDR ENGINEERING, INC. received $7.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 75 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $157.6M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($3.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.8M
New awards
75
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
32%
UEI
KBCXMJ2WXRK7
Parent company
HDR, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. company family: 57 registered entities, $117.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.ENGLEWOOD, CO · Family page
    $29.1M
  2. HDR ENGINEERING, INCHONOLULU, HI
    $16.1M
  3. HDR ARCHITECTURE, INC.ARLINGTON, VA
    $11.4M
  4. HDR ENGINEERING INCOMAHA, NE
    $9.2M
  5. HDR ARCHITECTURE, INC.OMAHA, NE
    $8.8M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.8MFY2017
  2. 2.5MFY2018
  3. 14.7MFY2019
  4. 9.2MFY2020
  5. 15.7MFY2021
  6. 29MFY2022
  7. 33.3MFY2023
  8. 23.8MFY2024
  9. 16.7MFY2025
  10. 7.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Highway Administration$3.9M51%
    50 awards
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$3.3M43%
    4 awards
  3. National Park Service$435.9K5.6%
    19 awards
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$52K0.7%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$7.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Denver County, CO$6.2M79%
  2. Salt Lake County, UT$800K10%
  3. Mariposa County, CA$335.3K4.3%
  4. Modoc County, CA$263.7K3.4%
  5. Navarro County, TX$94.6K1.2%
  6. Anne Arundel County, MD$52K0.7%
  7. San Bernardino County, CA$50K0.6%
  8. Coconino County, AZ$41K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $2.5M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.8% · $2.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. GRCA 318719 - CD/SS/COMPLIANCE REHABILIT$12.5M
    National Park Service· Denver County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Jan 13, 2026· 140P2024F0406
  2. CA NP MOJA 11(2) 10(2) KELSO CIMA & KELBAKER ROADS 30% DESIGN TASK ORDER$3.3M
    Federal Highway Administration· Denver County, CO· Construction & real property· Apr 26, 2023 – Feb 4, 2026· 6982AF23F00075N
  3. AZ FLAP SR88(1), APACHE TRAIL DTFH6816D00003/6982AF22F000154N$2.9M
    Federal Highway Administration· Pinal County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 2, 2022 – Dec 9, 2025· 6982AF22F00154N
  4. BANNOCK PUMPING PLANT MODERNIZATION$2.8M
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Denver County, CO· Construction & real property· Aug 27, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· 140A1626F0099
  5. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES$2.1M
    Federal Highway Administration· Salt Lake County, UT· Construction & real property· Jun 2, 2025 – Sep 8, 2026· 6982AF25F00050N
  6. ND NP THRO 10(5) NORTH UNIT LOOP ROAD SCOPING THROUGH 30% DESIGN TASK ORDER ROAD CONSTRUCTION DESIGN$1.9M
    Federal Highway Administration· Denver County, CO· Construction & real property· Aug 11, 2025 – Aug 18, 2026· 6982AF25F00077N
  7. ZION 240182 SOUTH ENTRANCE BRIDGE DESIGN$1.6M
    National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Jul 8, 2022 – Apr 6, 2026· 140P2022F0198
  8. GRCA 190083 250176 TCWL - TITLE III SCADA PROGRAMMING$1.5M
    National Park Service· Coconino County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 21, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 140P2025F0190

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.7M (17 subawards)

14 sub-recipients

  1. WOOLPERT, INC.$221.9K13%
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward
  2. SHANNON & WILSON INC$178.9K10%
    SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards
  3. LITHOS ENGINEERING, LLC$175K10%
    DENVER, CO · 1 subaward
  4. NATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC$173.1K10%
    BROKEN ARROW, OK · 1 subaward
  5. SOIL AND LAND USE TECHNOLOGY, INC$170.1K9.9%
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  6. GORDON US, LLC$161.1K9.4%
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  7. COLLIER GEOPHYSICS LLC$155.8K9.1%
    STEPHENVILLE, TX · 2 subawards
  8. ADW COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.$102.1K6.0%
    TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward
  9. DJ&A, P.C.$79.1K4.6%
    MISSOULA, MT · 1 subaward
  10. PILCH ENGINEERING, LLC$77.2K4.5%
    CASPER, WY · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 22% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.2M paid out · $204.8K received
  • FY2022: $2.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $2.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $5.7M paid out · $282.3K received
  • FY2025: $6.8M paid out · $268.6K received
  • FY2026: $1.7M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

525 companies · $362.9M reported

  1. CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC$23.2M
    STUART, FL · 9 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. COLORADO NETWORK STAFFING, INC.$14.3M
    WESTMINSTER, CO · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MK ENGINEERS, LTD.$11.7M
    MILILANI, HI · 42 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $20.6M reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$3.8M
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$3.7M
    DENVER, CO · 11 subawards
  3. EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC$3.6M
    HUNT VALLEY, MD · 7 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 26 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$561M−19% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 3 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$260.5M−45% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 38 entities · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. (57 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HDR Engineering, IncAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$70K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$10K
    1 reports
  3. 2025$70K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations4 reports
  3. Natural resources4 reports
  4. Transportation4 reports
  5. Agriculture3 reports
  6. Clean air and water3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES10 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE10 reports
  3. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)4 reports
  4. Bureau of Reclamation4 reports
  5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)4 reports
  6. Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. TROUTMAN STRATEGIES$90K
    6 reports
  2. Water Strategies, LLC$50K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.