Federal contractor · REDMOND, WA
EOSPACE INC.
EOSPACE INC. received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−13% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $32.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 15%
- UEI
- JAUFFPDZBAG2
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.7MFY2017
- 1MFY2018
- 2.1MFY2019
- 3.2MFY2020
- 606.3KFY2021
- 3.6MFY2022
- 2.5MFY2023
- 12.7MFY2024
- 2.3MFY2025
- 2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$2M100%7 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Research & development$2M100%
Where the work was performed
- King County, WA$2M100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition15%US 39% · $299.5K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions15%US 8.8% · $299.5K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· May 31, 2023 – Apr 21, 2026· N6833523C0289
- 873AUTHORITY$1.2MDepartment of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Feb 5, 2024 – Apr 7, 2026· N6426724C0030
- Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Jun 14, 2023 – Feb 24, 2026· N6833523C0288
- 873AUTHORITY$900KDepartment of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Apr 7, 2026 – Apr 7, 2026· N6426726C7151
- 873AUTHORITY$899.7KDepartment of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Feb 4, 2025 – May 27, 2026· N6426725C7050
- 873AUTHORITY$899.6KDepartment of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Jul 17, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N6426725C7040
- Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Research & development· Oct 14, 2025 – Oct 14, 2025· N6833526C0056
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $331K (1 subaward)
1 prime
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$331K100%PALM BAY, FL · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.4M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $371.9K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $331K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
7 companies · $11.4M reported
- HUNTSVILLE, AL · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
- GREENVILLE, TX · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services
- LEXINGTON, MA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- EXO-ATMOSPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC$12.8M−52% in FY2026WAUKESHA, WI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
- SPECTER AEROSPACE INC.$12.1M−67% in FY2026PEABODY, MA · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
- CONCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$12.8M−94% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.