Federal contractor · PALM BAY, FL

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $359.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 178 awards (+26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.3B. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($175.3M). It also received $138.7K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$359.3M
New awards
178
Sole-source
62%
Single offer
0.4%
UEI
QM4EZDV15JL8
Parent company
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. company family: 154 registered entities, $6.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.GREENVILLE, TX · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. HARRIS CORPORATIONPOTTSTOWN, PA
    $1B
  3. L3HARRIS GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.ROCHESTER, NY
    $460.4M
  4. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $380.7M
  5. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.WACO, TX
    $377.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 625.5MFY2017
  2. 616.6MFY2018
  3. 428.6MFY2019
  4. 259.1MFY2020
  5. 430.9MFY2021
  6. 480.1MFY2022
  7. 445.2MFY2023
  8. 396.2MFY2024
  9. 286.2MFY2025
  10. 359.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$175.3M49%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Army$57.9M16%
    21 awards
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$55M15%
    5 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$31.8M8.8%
    122 awards
  5. Department of the Air Force$31.6M8.8%
    9 awards
  6. U.S. Special Operations Command$5.7M1.6%
    2 awards
  7. U.S. Secret Service$2.1M0.6%
    1 awards
  8. U.S. Marshals Service$135K0.0%
    1 awards
  9. Defense Microelectronics Activity$5,0000.0%
    1 awards
  10. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$172.9M48%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$96M27%
  3. IT & telecom$76.8M21%
  4. Research & development$11.1M3.1%
  5. Equipment maintenance$2M0.6%
  6. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$410K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Brevard County, FL$329.4M92%
  2. Passaic County, NJ$14.9M4.1%
  3. Middlesex County, MA$8.8M2.4%
  4. District of Columbia, DC$2.1M0.6%
  5. Fayette County, KY$1.5M0.4%
  6. Hillsborough County, FL$755.5K0.2%
  7. Norfolk city, VA$637.4K0.2%
  8. Union County, NJ$480.3K0.1%
  9. San Diego County, CA$410K0.1%
  10. Harford County, MD$204.2K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition62%
    US 39% · $222.6M
  • Sole-source awards62%
    US 30% · $221.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.4%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$160M
    Department of Transportation · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$31.3M
    Department of Defense · 42 awards
  3. Department of the Army$14.2M
    Department of Defense · 11 awards
  4. U.S. Special Operations Command$4.9M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  5. U.S. Marshals Service$135K
    Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO DEVELOP THE GROUND SYSTEM THAT WILL SUPPORT NOAA S NEXT GENERATION GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE SERIES, GOES-R. THIS NEW SERIES OF SPACECRAFT, SET TO BEGIN LAUNCHING IN 2015, IS EXPECTED TO DOUBLE THE CLARITY OF TODAY S SATELLITE IMAGERY AND PROVIDE AT LEAST 20 TIMES MORE ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS FROM SPACE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST AND IMPLEMENT THE GOES-R GROUND SYSTEM. THE GROUND SYSTEM WILL CAPTURE DATA FROM THE GOES-R SATELLITES, AND PROCESS AND DISTRIBUTE THE INFORMATION TO OPERATIONAL USERS.$1.8B
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Brevard County, FL· IT & telecom· Oct 11, 2016 – Apr 10, 2026· DOCDG133E09CN0094
  2. VOICE SWITCHING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (VSCS)$346M
    Federal Aviation Administration· Brevard County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 8, 2017 – Sep 21, 2026· DTFAWA07C00014CALL0001
  3. MET SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT UCA$262.1M
    Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· IT & telecom· Apr 21, 2020 – Jun 4, 2026· W52P1J20C0014
  4. SDA TRACKING LAYER TRANCHE 0, WIDE FIELD OF VIEW (WFOV) PROGRAM$221.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Brevard County, FL· Research & development· Oct 2, 2020 – Apr 10, 2026· HQ085021C0002
  5. COUNTER COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS MEADOWLAND PRODUCTION$206.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Brevard County, FL· Professional services· Oct 22, 2021 – May 20, 2026· FA881922C0001
  6. GGSS TASK ORDER 0002 - SUSTAINMENT SERVICES - 5 YEARS$175.1M
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Brevard County, FL· Professional services· May 11, 2023 – Aug 10, 2026· 1332KP23FNAAA0022
  7. OPERATIONAL AND SUPPORTABILITY IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM (OASIS) II$127.4M
    Federal Aviation Administration· Brevard County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 3, 2017 – Sep 2, 2026· DTFAWA15C00006
  8. ULV SHIPBOARD SCPC/DYNAMIC MODEM SYSTEM$126.7M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Brevard County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 16, 2017 – Mar 9, 2026· N0003914C0041

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $138.7K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 7 actions (0 new awards), −40% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms ($138.7K).

Assistance · FY2026
$138.7K
New awards
0
Actions
7
Since FY2021
$520.4K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 151.3KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. -0.3FY2024
  4. 230.4KFY2025
  5. 138.7KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$138.7K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms$138.7K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$138.7K100%
    Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. ROBUST QUANTUM SENSORS (ROQS) TECHNICAL AREA 2$369.1K
    12.002 · Procurement Technical Assistance for Business Firms· Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Other financial assistance· Jun 9, 2025 – Aug 12, 2026· HR00112530156

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $48.5M (113 subawards)

68 sub-recipients

  1. ARINC INCORPORATED$17.5M36%
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 12 subawards
  2. AVL TECHNOLOGIES INC$7.2M15%
    ASHEVILLE, NC · 1 subaward
  3. CAES SYSTEMS LLC$5.9M12%
    LANSDALE, PA · 1 subaward
  4. KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$3M6.2%
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards
  5. COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES CANADA INC.$2.3M4.6%
    GEORGETOWN, ON · 7 subawards
  6. ONEIL & ASSOCIATES INC$2.2M4.6%
    MIAMISBURG, OH · 1 subaward
  7. CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP$1.7M3.4%
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards
  8. ANTENNAS FOR COMMUNICATIONS, OCALA, FL, INC.$1.5M3.0%
    OCALA, FL · 1 subaward
  9. CAS SEVERN, INC$1.1M2.4%
    LAUREL, MD · 3 subawards
  10. VADATECH INC$858.5K1.8%
    HENDERSON, NV · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $9.2M (19 subawards)

8 primes

  1. THE BOEING COMPANY$3.9M43%
    MESA, AZ · 3 subawards
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2.8M31%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 7 subawards
  3. BOEING COMPANY, THE$1.3M14%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2 subawards
  4. HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP$798.2K8.7%
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  5. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$168K1.8%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards
  6. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP$118K1.3%
    STRATFORD, CT · 1 subaward
  7. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC, THE$58.3K0.6%
    LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward
  8. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$34.8K0.4%
    MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 14% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $53.9M paid out · $1.1B received
  • FY2022: $40.2M paid out · $1.1B received
  • FY2023: $40.3M paid out · $420.9M received
  • FY2024: $95.8M paid out · $383.7M received
  • FY2025: $93.5M paid out · $170.6M received
  • FY2026: $48.5M paid out · $9.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,936 companies · $39.2T reported

  1. CPI RADANT TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION INC.$39.2T
    STOW, MA · 63 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. USA MACHINE INC.$3.9B
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$188.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 268 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

121 companies · $33.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$16.4B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3,138 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.6B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 622 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$5B
    TUCSON, AZ · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+10 more
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$22.3B−44% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 84 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. (154 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Harris CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Jariet TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • L-3 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • L3 Harris Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • NV5 GeospatialAI match · 99%
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INCAI match · 98%
  • L-3 Harris Technologies Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.1M
38 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$8.9M
$8.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$777.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.9M
    44 reports
  2. 2024$2.3M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$2.1M
    38 reports
  4. 2026$1.6M
    19 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense92 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations59 reports
  3. Science and technology44 reports
  4. Transportation28 reports
  5. Aerospace17 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  7. Natural resources15 reports
  8. Intelligence and surveillance14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES94 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE91 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)43 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)29 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)23 reports
  6. Natl Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)22 reports
  7. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)18 reports
  8. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)15 reports
  9. Interior - Dept of (DOI)15 reports
  10. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)15 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$750K
    15 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$520K
    12 reports
  3. The McKeon Group, Inc.$360K
    11 reports
  4. The Nickles Group, LLC$350K
    5 reports
  5. Velocity Government Relations, LLC$297.7K
    12 reports
  6. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$210K
    6 reports
  7. BALLARD PARTNERS$190K
    8 reports
  8. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$190K
    4 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$429K55%
  2. Democratic$345.5K44%
  3. Other or none$3,0000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC$1.6M raised this cycle
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC PAC$96.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.