Federal contractor · GRAND RAPIDS, MI

GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC

GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC received $36.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 121 awards (−10% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $440.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($17.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$36.7M
New awards
121
Sole-source
98%
Single offer
1.0%
UEI
P6M6L6AKMZA7
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY company family: 71 registered entities, $2.3B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYLYNN, MA · Family page
    $1.4B
  2. $636.3M
  3. $69.4M
  4. GE RENEWABLES US LLCGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
    $69.2M
  5. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYWEST CHESTER, OH
    $31.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 27.6MFY2017
  2. 37.4MFY2018
  3. 49.6MFY2019
  4. 56MFY2020
  5. 51.2MFY2021
  6. 46.6MFY2022
  7. 45.8MFY2023
  8. 48.6MFY2024
  9. 40.8MFY2025
  10. 36.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 44 awards
  2. 24 awards
  3. 34 awards
  4. 9 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 4 awards
  8. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$23.8M65%
  2. Professional services$6.8M18%
  3. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.9M8.0%
  4. Equipment maintenance$2.3M6.3%
  5. IT & telecom$822.9K2.2%
  6. Education & social services$50.8K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$20.1K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99%
    US 39% · $36.5M
  • Sole-source awards98%
    US 30% · $36.1M
  • Single-offer competitions1.0%
    US 8.7% · $382.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 16 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 18 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 9 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  5. Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Kent County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 25, 2024 – Feb 25, 2026· N0038325F0N80
  2. Department of the Navy· Pinellas County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 8, 2025 – Oct 23, 2025· N0038326FN800
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Kent County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 20, 2026 – Jan 20, 2026· SPRTA126F0099
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Kent County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 25, 2024 – Jan 15, 2026· SPRTA124F0999
  5. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Professional services· Jan 7, 2026 – Jan 7, 2026· FA850426FB003
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency· Houston County, GA· Professional services· Dec 13, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· FA850425FB002
  7. Department of the Navy· Kent County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 27, 2023 – May 11, 2026· N0001923C0067
  8. Department of the Air Force· Kent County, MI· Professional services· Nov 19, 2021 – Mar 16, 2026· FA850422C0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.3M (9 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. FORT WALTON BEACH, FL · 1 subaward
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards
  3. TORONTO, ON · 1 subaward
  4. ALLEGIS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$224.4K9.9%
    HANOVER, MD · 2 subawards
  5. TTI INC.$41.6K1.8%
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward
  6. POWEREX, INC.$36.2K1.6%
    YOUNGWOOD, PA · 1 subaward
  7. TORONTO, ON · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $34M (14 subawards)

6 primes

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 4 subawards
  3. MESA, AZ · 2 subawards
  4. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2 subawards
  5. TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards
  6. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 6.2% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $173.8K paid out · $46.9M received
  • FY2022: $647.6K paid out · $52.6M received
  • FY2023: $765K paid out · $54.6M received
  • FY2024: $1.2M paid out · $102.3M received
  • FY2025: $4.4M paid out · $293.8M received
  • FY2026: $2.3M paid out · $34M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

506 companies · $1.7B reported

  1. YORK, PA · 22 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. VALENCIA, CA · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. IRVINE, CA · 57 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

99 companies · $2.4B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1,720 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 296 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 72 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 95 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE$3.6B−0.6% in FY2026
    AMARILLO, TX · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION$3.5B−27% in FY2026
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 29 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+2 more
  3. POWAY, CA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (71 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYAI match · 98%
  • Innoveering, LLCAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$644K
19 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.9M
PAC giving · 2026
$369.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.3M
    41 reports
  2. 2024$734.7K
    31 reports
  3. 2025$644K
    19 reports
  4. 2026$222K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense74 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations53 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code28 reports
  4. Transportation17 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear15 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines14 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)10 reports
  8. Aerospace8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE82 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES77 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$560K
    14 reports
  2. Harbinger Strategies, LLC$460K
    6 reports
  3. Avoq, LLC$420K
    7 reports
  4. Miller Strategies, LLC$380K
    14 reports
  5. Strategic Marketing Innovations$370K
    9 reports
  6. HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC$295K
    13 reports
  7. Cardinal Point Partners$130K
    11 reports
  8. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$100K
    4 reports

12 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$242K65%
  2. Democratic$127.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AEROSPACE EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GE AEROSPACE PAC)$867.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.