Federal contractor · DALLASTOWN, PA

GICHNER SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for GICHNER SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $73.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
GL85ACATYXX5
Parent company
FLORIDA TURBINE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the KRATOS S2, INC company family: 9 registered entities, $59.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. KRATOS S2, INCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO · Family page
    $33.1M
  2. KRATOS S1, INC.COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $10.8M
  3. KRATOS DEFENSE & ROCKET SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA
    $5.3M
  4. KRATOS SRE, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA
    $4.4M
  5. FLORIDA TURBINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.JUPITER, FL
    $4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 8.5MFY2018
  3. 8.5MFY2019
  4. 2.7MFY2020
  5. 13.7MFY2021
  6. 5.9MFY2022
  7. 6.7MFY2023
  8. 13.5MFY2024
  9. 8.7MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE 55 MFAS PER CLIN 0025, 11 MFSO A PER CLIN 0026, 11 MFSO B PER CLIN 0027, SIX (6) MFIS PER CLIN 0028, AND TWO (2) MFSO C PER CLIN 0030.$6.6M
    Department of the Navy· York County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 2, 2025 – Feb 17, 2026· N6833525F0064
  2. MERWS KITS$5.4M
    Department of the Army· York County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 26, 2024 – May 5, 2026· W911QY24F0085
  3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE 17 MFAS PER CLIN 0231.$1.3M
    Department of the Navy· York County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 28, 2025 – Feb 17, 2026· N6833525F0252
  4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE EIGHT (8) MFAS FOR $87,370.00 EACH, PER CLIN 0225, FOR A TOTAL OF $698,960.00.$699K
    Department of the Navy· York County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 19, 2024 – Feb 17, 2026· N6833525F0102

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $20.6M (10 subawards)

5 primes

  1. DYNETICS, INC.$13.5M66%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$3.7M18%
    LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, MD · 1 subaward
  3. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$1.8M8.9%
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  4. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1.5M7.2%
    ROY, UT · 6 subawards
  5. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$55K0.3%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.1B received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $33M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $68.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $32.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $35M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $20.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

100 companies · $270.3M reported

  1. MILLENNIUM LLC$62M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 16 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$53.2M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 17 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. AVL TECHNOLOGIES INC$32.9M
    ASHEVILLE, NC · 29 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

50 companies · $2B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1.2B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 76 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$555.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 108 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. TECH-MARINE BUSINESS, INC$48.9M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 23 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 38 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AXIENT LLC$264.2M−29% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC$246.9M−49% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. IST RESEARCH, LLC$180.5M+55% in FY2026
    FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesState · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of KRATOS S2, INC (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Kratos DefenseAI match · 96%
Lobbying · 2025
$20K
2 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Defense - Dept of (DOD)2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MO STRATEGIES, INC.$20K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.