Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

SHANNON & WILSON INC

SHANNON & WILSON INC received -$1,919 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2,500).

Obligations · FY2026
-$1,919
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
KJZTRPLEXUN9
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $434K in FY2026 together.

  1. SHANNON & WILSON INCSEATTLE, WA · Family page
    -$1,919
  2. $435.9K
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 202.8KFY2017
  2. 626.6KFY2018
  3. 927KFY2019
  4. 263.9KFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. -18.1KFY2022
  7. 1.2MFY2023
  8. 1.4MFY2024
  9. 1.8MFY2025
  10. -1.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2,500100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Highway Administration· King County, WA· Professional services· Jul 22, 2021 – Sep 4, 2026· 69056721P000030
  2. Department of the Army· King County, WA· Construction & real property· Apr 27, 2026 – Apr 27, 2026· W912DW26FA047

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $502.8K (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward
  2. DENVER, CO · 2 subawards
  3. HDR B&V JV$128K25%
    NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $432.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $600.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $322.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $167.8K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $502.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $561.8K reported

  1. MARK MARINE SERVICE, INC.$265.1K
    WASHOUGAL, WA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUBBARD, OR · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STONE MOUNTAIN, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

14 companies · $7.9M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. COVINGTON, LA · 2 subawards · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. YORK, PA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INC$4.4M−85% in FY2026
    HILO, HI · 2 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MOFFATT & NICHOL$4.3M+141% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 8 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.