Federal contractor · NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI

HEXAGON MANUFACTURING INTELLIGENCE, LLC

HEXAGON MANUFACTURING INTELLIGENCE, LLC received $6.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 57 awards (+2.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $45.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.7M
New awards
57
Sole-source
46%
Single offer
41%
UEI
EK4EVQQNEFC6
Parent company
HEXAGON AKTIEBOLAG
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

11 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $7.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. HEXAGON MANUFACTURING INTELLIGENCE, LLCNORTH KINGSTOWN, RI · Family page
    $6.7M
  2. LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC.ALPHARETTA, GA
    $818.3K
  3. $16.5K
  4. $4,500
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. ERDAS INCNORCROSS, GA
    $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. OXBLUE LLCATLANTA, GA
    $0
  11. SIGMA SPACE LLCLANHAM, MD
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2017
  2. 1.8MFY2018
  3. 2.3MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 6.1MFY2021
  6. 5.4MFY2022
  7. 6.8MFY2023
  8. 6.3MFY2024
  9. 6.5MFY2025
  10. 6.7MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 21 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 10 awards
  4. 9 awards
  5. 8 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$5.5M82%
  2. IT & telecom$604.2K9.0%
  3. Equipment maintenance$600.7K9.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kern County, CA$81.7K1.2%
  2. Abroad$40.5K0.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition88%
    US 39% · $5.9M
  • Sole-source awards46%
    US 30% · $3.1M
  • Single-offer competitions41%
    US 8.8% · $2.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 5 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 6 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  5. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· May 27, 2026 – May 27, 2026· N6426726P4141
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 31, 2025 – Jan 7, 2026· SPRPA126CYA06
  3. MYCARE HMA$441.5K
    Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Apr 17, 2025 – Apr 14, 2026· N6852025P0053
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 22, 2026 – Jul 22, 2026· 80NSSC26P1072
  5. Department of the Navy· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· May 7, 2026 – May 26, 2026· N6449826P2047
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 17, 2026 – Aug 17, 2026· 80NSSC26P1155
  7. Department of the Army· Rock Island County, IL· Equipment maintenance· Sep 14, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· W9098S22P0135
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Washington County, RI· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· SPMYM226P5739

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.9M (15 subawards)

7 primes

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 6 subawards
  2. DYNETICS, INC.$750.7K26%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  3. KANSAS CITY, MO · 4 subawards
  4. PALMDALE, CA · 1 subaward
  5. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward
  6. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  7. PERATON INC.$62K2.1%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

39 companies · $44.7M reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 45 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 2 subawards · Waste treatment and disposal
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 10 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 59 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW CASTLE, DE · 2 entities · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+5 more
  2. MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION$48M−35% in FY2026
    EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 23 entities · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+11 more
  3. JEOL USA, INC.$14.9M+54% in FY2026
    PEABODY, MA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance+8 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HEXAGON MANUFACTURING INTELLIGENCE, LLC (11 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • INTERGRAPH CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Leica Geosystems Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$0
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$30.5K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$30.5K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Miscellaneous tariff bills2 reports
  2. Government issues1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Miller-Wenhold Capitol Strategies$30.5K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PACs sponsored

  • INTERGRAPH CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.