Federal contractor · ROCKVILLE, MD

JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC

JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC received $23M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 59 awards (−5.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $135M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($14.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$23M
New awards
59
Sole-source
36%
Single offer
2.5%
UEI
G15SWMLGAX81
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $73.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $50.9M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.4MFY2017
  2. 5.5MFY2018
  3. 8.1MFY2019
  4. 7.6MFY2020
  5. 8.1MFY2021
  6. 11.7MFY2022
  7. 20.9MFY2023
  8. 23.2MFY2024
  9. 24.4MFY2025
  10. 23MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 30 awards
  3. 11 awards
  4. 4 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 4 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$14.3M62%
  2. Equipment maintenance$8M35%
  3. Professional services$520.3K2.3%
  4. Construction & real property$113.5K0.5%
  5. Facilities & utilities$7,4970.0%
  6. IT & telecom$2,3760.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$443.6K1.9%
  2. Bexar County, TX$370.7K1.6%
  3. York County, ME$274.5K1.2%
  4. York County, VA$115.7K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition39%
    US 39% · $8.9M
  • Sole-source awards36%
    US 30% · $8.4M
  • Single-offer competitions2.5%
    US 8.7% · $568.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.5%
    US 5.1% · $115.7K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 22 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. Department of State · 7 awards
  4. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards
  5. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 3, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· FA873023F0008
  2. Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Dec 22, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· N0042126F0393
  3. Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2021 – Mar 30, 2026· FA460021C0029
  4. Department of the Navy· Portsmouth city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Jul 8, 2024 – Apr 27, 2026· N4215824PS075
  5. Department of the Navy· York County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· May 6, 2022 – May 7, 2026· N0018922P0311
  6. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· May 22, 2025 – Oct 2, 2025· FA301625F0226
  7. Department of the Navy· King County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 1, 2024 – Apr 29, 2026· N3220524P0131
  8. Drug Enforcement Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Sep 23, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· 15DDHQ24F00000912

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $160.1K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. BASTION SECURITY & IT SOLUTIONS LLC$160.1K100%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.7M (19 subawards)

5 primes

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 10 subawards
  4. VIGOR MARINE LLC$295.9K7.9%
    PORTLAND, OR · 2 subawards
  5. PORTSMOUTH, VA · 3 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.7% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2023: $297.2K paid out · $8.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2025: $426.1K paid out · $12M received
  • FY2026: $160.1K paid out · $3.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

75 companies · $28M reported

  1. HONOLULU, HI · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MOUNT AIRY, MD · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. UNIVERSAL WIRING SYSTEMS INC$1.8M
    HILLSBORO, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $39.4M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 77 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 39 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 7 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 48 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.$287.4M−54% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BOWHEAD MISSION SOLUTIONS, LLC$433M−52% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 12 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS INC$158.9M−91% in FY2026
    MADISON, AL · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.