Federal contractor · FREDERICK, MD

LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INC

LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INC received $415.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 116 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8.4B. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($415.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$415.6M
New awards
116
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HV8BH9BPG8Y9
Parent company
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LEIDOS, INC. company family: 96 registered entities, $9.8B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA · Family page
    $2.3B
  2. $2.4B
  3. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA
    $1.1B
  4. DYNETICS, INC.HUNTSVILLE, AL
    $1B
  5. LEIDOS, INC.GAITHERSBURG, MD
    $606M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 881.6MFY2017
  2. 784MFY2018
  3. 659.9MFY2019
  4. 1.2BFY2020
  5. 934.7MFY2021
  6. 981.7MFY2022
  7. 1.2BFY2023
  8. 869.3MFY2024
  9. 559.6MFY2025
  10. 415.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 116 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$424.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$2.1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$2.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Nov 29, 2016 – Aug 7, 2026· HHSN261200800001E
  2. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2020 – Jun 18, 2026· 75N91020F00003
  3. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Research & development· Aug 29, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 75N91025F00016
  4. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Aug 30, 2019 – May 21, 2026· 75N91019F00129
  5. MD NET$181.4M
    National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Research & development· Sep 26, 2019 – Sep 3, 2026· 75N91019F00139
  6. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Research & development· Jun 1, 2023 – Jul 22, 2026· 75N91023F00008
  7. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Research & development· Sep 1, 2020 – Sep 9, 2026· 75N91020F00039
  8. National Institutes of Health· Frederick County, MD· Research & development· Feb 16, 2021 – Mar 6, 2026· 75N91021F00004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $65M (54 subawards)

40 sub-recipients

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 4 subawards
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards
  3. MANASSAS, VA · 1 subaward
  4. NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward
  5. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  6. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 1 subaward
  7. ROCKVILLE, MD · 1 subaward
  8. LOS ANGELES, CA · 2 subawards
  9. FEI COMPANY$1.3M2.0%
    HILLSBORO, OR · 2 subawards
  10. CHICAGO, IL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 16% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $63.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $54.3M paid out · $214.3K received
  • FY2023: $128M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $264M paid out · $214.3K received
  • FY2025: $144.2M paid out · $65K received
  • FY2026: $65M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2027: $640.1K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3,387 companies · $14B reported

  1. EDGEWOOD, MD · 9 subawards · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. KANSAS CITY, MO · 118 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 543 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

106 companies · $2.9B reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 107 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 260 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 91 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 201 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LA CROSSE, WI · 30 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physiciansArmy · Offices of physicians
  2. RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+13 more
  3. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LEIDOS, INC. (96 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LEIDOS, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.9M
48 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$13.6M
$13.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$858.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.5M
    39 reports
  2. 2024$3.8M
    40 reports
  3. 2025$4.9M
    48 reports
  4. 2026$2.4M
    24 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense99 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations95 reports
  3. Science and technology41 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code37 reports
  5. Veterans35 reports
  6. Homeland security34 reports
  7. Aerospace27 reports
  8. Energy and nuclear20 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES151 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE145 reports
  3. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)13 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The OB-C Group. LLC$910K
    13 reports
  2. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$820K
    14 reports
  3. CR Federal$570K
    14 reports
  4. Squire Patton Boggs$540K
    6 reports
  5. CGCN GROUP, LLC$510K
    6 reports
  6. American Defense International, Inc.$460K
    14 reports
  7. TEAM HALLAHAN LLC$420K
    14 reports
  8. 535 GROUP, LLC$420K
    14 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$468.5K55%
  2. Democratic$390K45%

PACs sponsored

  • LEIDOS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.