Federal contractor · GAITHERSBURG, MD

LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLC

LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLC received -$1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards. Since FY2017: $64.3M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$1.6M
New awards
8
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
G9CZJMSCRR28
Parent company
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION company family: 128 registered entities, $46.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONFORT WORTH, TX · Family page
    $13B
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONGRAND PRAIRIE, TX
    $13.3B
  3. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATIONSTRATFORD, CT
    $2.9B
  4. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONORLANDO, FL
    $2.7B
  5. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONMOORESTOWN, NJ
    $2.5B

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 53.1MFY2017
  2. -528.9KFY2018
  3. 10MFY2019
  4. 16MFY2020
  5. 5.7MFY2021
  6. -5MFY2022
  7. -3.8MFY2023
  8. -9.1MFY2024
  9. -306.3KFY2025
  10. -1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Energy$00.0%
    1 awards
  2. Transportation Security Administration$00.0%
    4 awards
  3. Department of Housing and Urban Development$00.0%
    1 awards
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration-$1.6M0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF Y-12 PLANT AND OTHER PROGRAMS$20.6B
    Department of Energy· Anderson County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Dec 21, 2017 – Sep 29, 2026· DEAC0584OR21400
  2. ADP FACILITY MANAGEMENT$225.3M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2016 – Apr 29, 2026· HHSP23337001T
  3. TECHNICAL TRAINING$28M
    Transportation Security Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· Education & social services· Sep 6, 2018 – May 21, 2026· HSTS0111JOOP015
  4. INDEPENDENT GOVERNMENT COST ESTIMATE FOR LOGISTICS. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 09/01/11 - 09/01/2012$15.3M
    Transportation Security Administration· Arlington County, VA· Education & social services· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· HSTS0111JOOP087
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE DISTRIBUTION CENTER$10.4M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Jan 18, 2017 – May 22, 2026· HHSP233201200097G
  6. THIS TASK ORDER PROVIDES FOR THE SPECIALIZED SECURITY TRAINING SYSTEM SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION OF THE OVERALL CONTRACT, INCLUDING PROGRAM AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE OPERATIONAL AND TECHNICAL TRAINING DIVISION (OTT).$3.4M
    Transportation Security Administration· Arlington County, VA· Education & social services· Sep 13, 2017 – May 20, 2026· HSTS0110JOOP044
  7. SINGLE FAMILY CLIENT MANAGEMENT CALL CENTER (CPD COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CONTRACT)$2.2M
    Department of Housing and Urban Development· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Jul 16, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· HUDCOPC23291OPCT0004
  8. THIS TASK ORDER IS BEING ISSUED TO SUPPORT THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION S (TSA) OPERATIONAL AND TECHNICAL TRAINING DIVISION (OTT) AND THE OFFICE OF SECURITY OPERATIONS, EXPLOSIVES OPERATIONS DIVISION (EOD) WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AND LOGISTICS FOR TRAINING IN SUPPORT OF THE PIPELINE SECURITY AND BOMB SQUAD RESPONSE. SPECIFICALLY, THIS TASK ORDER PROVIDES SUPPORT TO DEVELOP CURRICULUM MATERIAL FOR PIPELINE TRAINING, REPRODUCTION AND DELIVERY OF PIPELINE TRAINING MATERIALS, CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE FOR BOMB SQUAD RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (BSRTS) COURSE CURRICULUM, AND REPRODUCTION AND DELIVERY OF THE BSRTS TRAINING MATERIALS.$320.3K
    Transportation Security Administration· Arlington County, VA· Education & social services· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· HSTS0110JOOP106

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4,982 companies · $247.8B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$43B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 6,189 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MARINETTE MARINE CORPORATION$32.3B
    MARINETTE, WI · 304 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$20.2B
    TUCSON, AZ · 6,713 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

114 companies · $3.1B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$763.9M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 318 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. BELL TEXTRON INC$636.9M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 25 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$426.1M
    TUCSON, AZ · 16 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 143 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$84.4B−24% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 227 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+13 more
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$74.6B+20% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 99 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+7 more
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+15 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (128 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • LifePortAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$15.6M
59 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$50.2M
$50.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.2M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$13.9M
    60 reports
  2. 2024$12.4M
    47 reports
  3. 2025$15.6M
    59 reports
  4. 2026$8.3M
    30 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense180 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations81 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code59 reports
  4. Aerospace17 reports
  5. Intelligence and surveillance15 reports
  6. Government issues14 reports
  7. Transportation14 reports
  8. Trade (domestic and foreign)14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE162 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES159 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)28 reports
  4. Navy - Dept of21 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)15 reports
  6. Air Force - Dept of14 reports
  7. Army - Dept of (Other)14 reports
  8. Office of the Secretary of Defense14 reports
  9. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)12 reports
  10. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Penn Avenue Partners$700K
    14 reports
  2. TheGROUP DC, LLC$650K
    14 reports
  3. Capitol Counsel LLC$630K
    14 reports
  4. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$450K
    14 reports
  5. Venable LLP$430K
    14 reports
  6. Public Strategies Washington, Inc.$420K
    14 reports
  7. Ballard Spahr LLP$420K
    14 reports
  8. Michael Best Strategies LLC$380K
    5 reports

21 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$742K59%
  2. Democratic$498.5K40%
  3. Other or none$7,0000.6%

PACs sponsored

  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$3.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.