Federal contractor · CAMBRIDGE, MD

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE received $15.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+114% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $770.7K. Its largest customer was U.S. Geological Survey ($15.1K). It also received $12.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$15.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JHTYTGKYWLL9
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 93.4KFY2017
  2. 104.1KFY2018
  3. -23.6KFY2019
  4. 33.8KFY2020
  5. 45.7KFY2021
  6. 406.7KFY2022
  7. 94KFY2023
  8. -5.6KFY2024
  9. 7.1KFY2025
  10. 15.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$15.1K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $15.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $15.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Geological Survey· Calvert County, MD· Professional services· Sep 10, 2024 – Dec 23, 2025· 140G0124P0278
  2. U.S. Geological Survey· Calvert County, MD· Professional services· Jan 29, 2026 – Jan 29, 2026· 140G0326P0022

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE received $12.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 64 actions (11 new awards), −28% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 11.417 · Sea Grant Support ($3.8M).

Assistance · FY2026
$12.2M
New awards
11
Actions
64
Since FY2021
$99.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 13.6MFY2021
  2. 12MFY2022
  3. 28.7MFY2023
  4. 16.2MFY2024
  5. 17MFY2025
  6. 12.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$12.2M100%

Top programs

  1. 11.417 · Sea Grant Support$3.8M31%
  2. 66.466 · Geographic Programs - Chesapeake Bay Program General, Technical Assistance, and Small Watershed Grants$2.5M20%
  3. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships$2M16%
  4. 11.478 · Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research Coastal Ocean Program$1.8M15%
  5. 10.310 · Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI)$650K5.3%
  6. 47.074 · Biological Sciences$503.7K4.1%
  7. 43.001 · Science$441.4K3.6%
  8. 47.050 · Geosciences$203.9K1.7%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Commerce
  2. Department of Agriculture
  3. Department of Transportation
  4. Department of the Interior

Largest awards

  1. 11.478 · Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research Coastal Ocean Program· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Aug 8, 2022 – Jul 9, 2026· NA22NOS4780172
  2. 11.417 · Sea Grant Support· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jun 13, 2024 – Sep 16, 2026· NA24OARX417C0034
  3. 47.050 · Geosciences· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Apr 11, 2024 – Aug 17, 2026· 2326774
  4. 66.466 · Geographic Programs - Chesapeake Bay Program General, Technical Assistance, and Small Watershed Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Grant· Jan 4, 2022 – Jun 6, 2026· 96391601
  5. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Jun 20, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026· 2452590
  6. 66.466 · Geographic Programs - Chesapeake Bay Program General, Technical Assistance, and Small Watershed Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Project grant· Feb 22, 2024 – Apr 7, 2026· 95335801

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.2M (6 subawards)

6 primes

  1. BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward
  2. TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward
  3. HOUGHTON, MI · 1 subaward
  4. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward
  5. GAINESVILLE, FL · 1 subaward
  6. COLLEGE PARK, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

26 companies · $13.7M reported

  1. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 12 subawards
  2. COLLEGE PARK, MD · 7 subawards
  3. BALTIMORE, MD · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FRISCO, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LITTLETON, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CORVALLIS, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.