Federal contractor · CHANDLER, AZ

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC received $8.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 22 awards (+125% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $21.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Microelectronics Activity ($5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.4M
New awards
22
Sole-source
82%
Single offer
14%
UEI
QSXSDASP8FT6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1MFY2021
  2. 393.1KFY2022
  3. 5.3MFY2023
  4. 2.6MFY2024
  5. 3.7MFY2025
  6. 8.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 9 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 6 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5M59%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$3.4M40%
  3. IT & telecom$28.6K0.3%
  4. Equipment maintenance$5,0800.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition96%
    US 39% · $8.1M
  • Sole-source awards82%
    US 30% · $6.9M
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 4 awards
  3. Department of Commerce · 1 awards
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 3 awards
  5. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Microelectronics Activity· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Jun 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· HQ072726CE001
  2. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· N0018926FL162
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 1333ND26FNB680244
  4. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 16, 2026 – Sep 16, 2026· 1333ND26PNB680448
  5. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 12, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· N0018926FL245
  6. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· N6523626FE176
  7. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 9, 2025 – Feb 10, 2026· FA857926P0006
  8. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· N6523626FE206

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $6.3M (35 subawards)

19 primes

  1. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 6 subawards
  2. PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward
  3. PITTSFIELD, MA · 4 subawards
  4. LAUREL, MD · 5 subawards
  5. SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 2 subawards
  6. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  7. PERATON INC.$388.5K6.2%
    HERNDON, VA · 4 subawards
  8. FULLERTON, CA · 1 subaward
  9. BROOMFIELD, CO · 1 subaward
  10. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $62.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $21.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $14.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $21.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $6.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

34 companies · $132.5M reported

  1. PASADENA, CA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 199 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GROTON, CT · 50 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 25 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ISOTECH NORTH AMERICA INC$6.3M−95% in FY2026
    COLCHESTER, VT · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+1 more
  2. FREDERICK, MD · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingDefense Microelectronics Activity · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. NORTH ATLANTIC INDUSTRIES, INC.$7.7M−97% in FY2026
    BOHEMIA, NY · 2 entities · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Microchip Technology Inc. (FKA Microsemi)AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$60K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$120K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$60K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Stapleton & Associates, LLC$120K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.