Federal contractor · MIDDLETOWN, RI

NETWORK & SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES INC

NETWORK & SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES INC received $12.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $178.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($13.1M).

Obligations · FY2026: $12.8M
New awards: 11
Sole-source: 0.0%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: W6LFAGLVXRU7
Parent company: SAALEX CORP

Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SAALEX CORP company family: 3 registered entities, $21.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

SAALEX CORPWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
Reported parent$8.6M
SAALEX CORPRIDGECREST, CA
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

13.7MFY2017
14.2MFY2018
13.7MFY2019
12.1MFY2020
11.9MFY2021
28.9MFY2022
29.5MFY2023
22.4MFY2024
18.9MFY2025
12.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Navy$13.1M100%
10 awards
Defense Contract Management Agency-$290K0.0%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Professional services$8.4M66%
Education & social services$4.3M33%
IT & telecom$162.2K1.3%

Where the work was performed

Kitsap County, WA$7.3M57%
Newport County, RI$5.5M43%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition0.0%
US 39% · $0
Sole-source awards0.0%
US 30% · $0
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.8% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICE (TSS) IN SUPPORT OF ALL DEPARTMENTS AT NUWC KEYPORT. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED INCLUDE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND CORPORATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES.$64.5M
Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Professional services· Nov 30, 2021 – Jun 11, 2026· N0025322F3000
WAR GAMING SUPPORT SERVICES, CPFF$5.7M
Defense Contract Management Agency· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Nov 6, 2019 – May 13, 2026· N0018920FZ036
CMOW SUPPORT SERVICES$2.2M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Apr 30, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· N0018925FZ348
ACADEMICS SUPPORT SERVICES TO$1.9M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Apr 30, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· N0018925FZ347
INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS SUPPORT SERVICES$1.6M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Apr 30, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· N0018925FZ345
THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVAL WAR COLLEGE. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. PLEASE SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES FOR DETAILS.$1.2M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Mar 24, 2026 – May 20, 2026· N0018926FB006
CNWS SUPPORT SEVICES$1.1M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Education & social services· Apr 30, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· N0018925FZ349
BASE PERIOD - NEW TO FOR WEB SERVICES$1.1M
Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· IT & telecom· Sep 7, 2022 – Feb 19, 2026· N0018922FZ530

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.4M received
FY2023: $2.5M paid out · $1.6M received
FY2024: $5.3M paid out · $3.1M received
FY2025: $3.3M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

35 companies · $21.1M reported

RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC.$5.6M
PAWCATUCK, CT · 22 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2.1M
MCLEAN, VA · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$2M
RESTON, VA · 23 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $21.2M reported

BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$6.9M
YORK, PA · 31 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
NEW DIRECTIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$6.1M
RIDGECREST, CA · 18 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC.$5.2M
PAWCATUCK, CT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

MOFFATT & NICHOL - BURNS & MCDONNELL HAWAII$79.1M+43% in FY2026
HONOLULU, HI · 2 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
ALEXANDRIA INSIGHTS, INC.$79.7M−43% in FY2026
STAFFORD, VA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
VECTOR PLANNING & SERVICES, INC.$80M+14% in FY2026
ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SAALEX CORP (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

SAALEX CORPAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $187.5K; 6 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026: $282.5K
PAC giving · 2026: $15.5K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2025$187.5K
6 reports
2026$95K
3 reports

Top issues

Defense9 reports
Aerospace8 reports
Budget and appropriations7 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

MOUNTAIN VIEW PARTNERS DC, LLC$262.5K
8 reports
FRONTERA GROUP$20K
1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$13K84%
Democratic$2,50016%

PACs sponsored

SAALEX CORP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$36.1K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Cory Mills$3,000
R-FL-7 · House · 1 PAC
Carlos A. Gimenez$2,000
R-FL-28 · House · 1 PAC
Rick Scott$2,000
R-FL · Senate · 1 PAC
Gabe Amo$1,500
D-RI-1 · House · 1 PAC
Mark Alford$1,000
R-MO-4 · House · 1 PAC
Donald G. Davis$1,000
D-NC-1 · House · 1 PAC
Joni Ernst$1,000
R-IA · Senate · 1 PAC
Mark B. Messmer$1,000
R-IN-8 · House · 1 PAC
Mike Rogers$1,000
R-AL-3 · House · 1 PAC
Austin Scott$1,000
R-GA-8 · House · 1 PAC

$15.5K of the $15.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 11 members of Congress.

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.