Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

PACIFICORP

PACIFICORP received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17M. Its largest customer was Internal Revenue Service ($917K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
10
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KCTLQ9KTA2N8
Parent company
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LEACHGARNER, INC. company family: 87 registered entities, $44.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LEACHGARNER, INC.ATTLEBORO, MA · Family page
    $5.2M
  2. $18.8M
  3. KITCO FIBER OPTICS INCVIRGINIA BEACH, VA
    $5.3M
  4. TTI INC.FORT WORTH, TX
    $4.7M
  5. TTI INCFORT WORTH, TX
    $3.9M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.6MFY2017
  2. 500.3KFY2018
  3. 2.6MFY2019
  4. 2.2MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 751.9KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 1.3MFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 5 awards
  4. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Internal Revenue Service· Weber County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2022 – Aug 5, 2026· 2091JB23C00002
  2. Indian Health Service· Jefferson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 21, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025· 75H71323P00076
  3. Bureau of Reclamation· Klamath County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jun 22, 2020 – Jan 20, 2026· 140R2020C0013
  4. Bureau of Reclamation· Multnomah County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 22, 2018 – Jul 27, 2026· 140R1018P0085
  5. Bureau of Reclamation· Klamath County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jul 22, 2025 – Jun 15, 2026· 140R2025C0008
  6. Bureau of Reclamation· Natrona County, WY· Facilities & utilities· Jul 30, 2024 – Jul 13, 2026· 140R6024P0040
  7. Bureau of Reclamation· Multnomah County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 20, 2018 – Aug 4, 2026· 140R1018P0034
  8. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Fremont County, WY· Facilities & utilities· May 23, 2024 – Mar 31, 2026· 140A2324P0276

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PACIFICORP received -$11.3M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 6 actions (0 new awards), −178% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development (-$2.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
-$11.3M
New awards
0
Actions
6
Since FY2021
$158.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021
  2. 5.1MFY2022
  3. -15.4KFY2023
  4. 149.8MFY2024
  5. 14.4MFY2025
  6. -11.3MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$11.3M0.0%

Top programs

  1. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development-$2.6M0.0%
  2. 81.254 · Grid Infrastructure Deployment and Resilience-$8.7M0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 81.254 · Grid Infrastructure Deployment and Resilience· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 29, 2024 – Jul 23, 2026· DEGD0000878
  2. 81.254 · Grid Infrastructure Deployment and Resilience· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 29, 2024 – Jul 23, 2026· DEGD0000898
  3. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Jul 19, 2022 – Apr 8, 2026· DEEE0009782

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.1M (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward
  2. CRATER LAKE ELECTRICAL JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING TRUST$112.1K5.5%
    CENTRAL POINT, OR · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $16.5M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION$12.4M75%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY$4.1M25%
    SALEM, OR · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $598K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $5.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $122.7K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $2.1M paid out · $16.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

22 companies · $13.1M reported

  1. NORTH LOGAN, UT · 2 subawards
  2. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 3 subawards
  3. AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

93 companies · $1.8B reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$761.9M
    DENVER, CO · 7 subawards
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 801 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 715 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 118 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAWASAWA LLC$63.7M−15% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturingAir Force · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing
  2. MAYAGUEZ, PR · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing
  3. PENTAQ MANUFACTURING CORP$60.2M−63% in FY2026
    SABANA GRANDE, PR · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LEACHGARNER, INC. (87 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • BNSF RAILWAY COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • PACIFICORPAI match · 100%
  • PacifiCorp EnergyAI match · 99%
  • Shaw Industries GroupAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$3.1M
42 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$10.6M
$10.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$686.5K
3 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$3M
    45 reports
  2. 2024$2.7M
    46 reports
  3. 2025$3.1M
    42 reports
  4. 2026$1.9M
    22 reports

Top issues

  1. Transportation86 reports
  2. Railroads52 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations51 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund36 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear30 reports
  6. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace28 reports
  7. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code21 reports
  8. Manufacturing14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE123 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES122 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$860K
    28 reports
  2. K&L GATES LLP$430K
    24 reports
  3. COGENT STRATEGIES LLC$420K
    14 reports
  4. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$340K
    14 reports
  5. Navigators Global LLC (Formerly DC Navigators, LLC)$340K
    14 reports
  6. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$300K
    14 reports
  7. The Madison Group$210K
    14 reports
  8. S2R, LLC$80K
    2 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$477.5K70%
  2. Democratic$204.5K30%
  3. Other or none$4,5000.7%

PACs sponsored

  • BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY RAILPAC (BNSF RAILPAC)$1.7M raised this cycle
  • MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY PAC$164.7K raised this cycle
  • PACIFICORP - PACIFIC POWER/ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER PAC$71.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.