Federal contractor · FLUSHING, NY

S & L AEROSPACE METALS LLC

S & L AEROSPACE METALS LLC received $299.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+5.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $13.5M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($282.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$299.6K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
7.1%
UEI
CBEBL768K564
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 722.9KFY2017
  2. 34.4KFY2018
  3. 2MFY2019
  4. 2.8MFY2020
  5. 12.4KFY2021
  6. 96.2KFY2022
  7. 6.5MFY2023
  8. 802.4KFY2024
  9. 283.4KFY2025
  10. 299.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$299.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.1%
    US 39% · $21.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions7.1%
    US 8.7% · $21.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Queens County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 70Z03826PR0000383
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Queens County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 6, 2023 – Mar 23, 2026· SPE4A724F2617
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Queens County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 30, 2025 – Jan 12, 2026· SPE4A725P5014
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Queens County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 31, 2024 – Jan 13, 2026· SPE4A725P1184
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Queens County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· SPE4A726P4510
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Queens County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 12, 2025 – May 11, 2026· SPE7M125V9247

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3M (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward
  3. STRATFORD, CT · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $7.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $31.1M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 107 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 30 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WK ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.$977.8K−100% in FY2026
    SANTA CLARITA, CA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing
  2. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 2 entities · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. MILITARY AIRCRAFT PARTS$970.6K−35% in FY2026
    RANCHO CORDOVA, CA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.