Federal contractor · SANTA BARBARA, CA
SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING LLC
SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING LLC received $92.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $5.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($92.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $92.8K
- New awards
- 1
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- TGCRLMJWHDG4
- Parent company
- HEICO CORP
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the ROBERTSON FUEL SYSTEMS, L.L.C. company family: 45 registered entities, $111.9M in FY2026 together. See the family
- ROBERTSON FUEL SYSTEMS, L.L.C.TEMPE, AZ · Family page$68.4M
- SEAL DYNAMICS LLCHAUPPAUGE, NY$32M
- RESEARCH ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.COOKEVILLE, TN$2.2M
- INERTIAL AIRLINE SERVICES INCCLEVELAND, OH$1.3M
- BLUE AEROSPACE LLCTAMARAC, FL$1.3M
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 117.4KFY2019
- 418.7KFY2020
- 22.9KFY2021
- 1.5MFY2022
- 2.4MFY2023
- 400.5KFY2024
- 513.5KFY2025
- 92.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$92.8K100%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$92.8K100%
Where the work was performed
- Santa Barbara County, CA$92.8K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $92.8K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $92.8K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Santa Barbara County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 9, 2025 – Jan 26, 2026· N0016425PJ557
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $201.2K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $488.6K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
57 companies · $562.6M reported
- THE BOEING COMPANY$174.8MSAINT LOUIS, MO · 116 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
- FORT WORTH, TX · 451 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- RAYTHEON COMPANY$64MTUCSON, AZ · 131 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 104 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TRIUMPH ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS LLC$209.9M−26% in FY2026WEST HARTFORD, CT · 16 entities · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+3 more
- WOODWARD HRT INC$314M−20% in FY2026VALENCIA, CA · 7 entities · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+8 more
- ECI DEFENSE GROUP, INC.$295M−16% in FY2026LAWRENCEVILLE, GA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing+11 more
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.