Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for SHANNON & WILSON, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2018: $5.8M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MMC9F7QGEJ76
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SHANNON & WILSON INC company family: 3 registered entities, $434K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SHANNON & WILSON INCSEATTLE, WA · Family page
    -$1,919
  2. SHANNON & WILSON INCANCHORAGE, AK
    $435.9K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6MFY2018
  2. 531KFY2019
  3. 566.4KFY2020
  4. 390.4KFY2021
  5. 200.2KFY2022
  6. 2.5MFY2023
  7. -64.7KFY2024
  8. 34.7KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for SHANNON & WILSON, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $198.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BRATSLAVSKY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.$198.4K100%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $37.1K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $40.7K received
  • FY2023: $561.8K paid out · $51.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $93.6K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $198.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $561.8K reported

  1. MARK MARINE SERVICE, INC.$265.1K
    WASHOUGAL, WA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WESTERN STATES SOIL CONSERVATION, INC.$202K
    HUBBARD, OR · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DURHAM GEO-ENTERPRISES INC$94.8K
    STONE MOUNTAIN, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

14 companies · $7.9M reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$3.2M
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$1M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WEEKS MARINE, INC.$797K
    COVINGTON, LA · 2 subawards · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BUCHART HORN CARDNO JOINT VENTURE$4.4M−98% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INC$4.4M−85% in FY2026
    HILO, HI · 2 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MOFFATT & NICHOL$4.3M+141% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 8 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.