Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

SHANNON & WILSON INC

SHANNON & WILSON INC received $435.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−69% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($464.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$435.9K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
M1NZA1TEJQF5
Parent company
SHANNON & WILSON INC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SHANNON & WILSON INC company family: 3 registered entities, $434K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SHANNON & WILSON INCSEATTLE, WA · Family page
    -$1,919
  2. SHANNON & WILSON, INC.PORTLAND, OR
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 151.8KFY2023
  2. 5KFY2024
  3. 1.4MFY2025
  4. 435.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$464.9K100%
    3 awards
  2. Federal Aviation Administration-$29K0.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$435.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK$265.5K61%
  2. Anchorage Municipality, AK$195.4K45%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $460.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$3,964
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $464.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. EIE480, EIE482 AND EIE483 PROJECTS ARE FOR GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES AT EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE IN ALASKA.$954.1K
    Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2025 – Mar 25, 2026· W911KB25FA088
  2. JBR041 GEOTECHNICAL, PALLET PROCESSING CENTER$206.6K
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Construction & real property· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· W911KB26FA056
  3. COLD BAY, AK - THE SCOPE OF WORK IS TO COMPLETE THE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR BLOCK 21, LOT 2 IN CAMP IN COLD BAY, AK.$200.8K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Aleutians East Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Sep 11, 2025 – May 20, 2026· 6973GH25P03505
  4. FORT YUKON RCAG (FYU) GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES ADVANCING GEOTECHNICAL BORINGS, CONDUCTING LABORATORY TESTING ON SOIL SAMPLES, CONDUCTING ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, AND DEVELOPING A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. IN ACCORDAN$93.5K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Construction & real property· Jul 3, 2025 – Jul 21, 2026· 6973GH25P02652
  5. FTW516 DFAC GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION$83.4K
    Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W911KB26FA063
  6. THE SCOPE OF WORK IS TO COMPLETE THE GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR THE RCAG BUILDING AND ANTENNA FOUNDATION DESIGNS.$78.1K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Nome Census Area, AK· Construction & real property· Aug 21, 2025 – Jul 20, 2026· 6973GH25P03160

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $361.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $935.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $688.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $216.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $561.8K reported

  1. MARK MARINE SERVICE, INC.$265.1K
    WASHOUGAL, WA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WESTERN STATES SOIL CONSERVATION, INC.$202K
    HUBBARD, OR · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DURHAM GEO-ENTERPRISES INC$94.8K
    STONE MOUNTAIN, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

14 companies · $7.9M reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$3.2M
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$1M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WEEKS MARINE, INC.$797K
    COVINGTON, LA · 2 subawards · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BUCHART HORN CARDNO JOINT VENTURE$4.4M−98% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INC$4.4M−85% in FY2026
    HILO, HI · 2 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MOFFATT & NICHOL$4.3M+141% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 8 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.