Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED

SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−42% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.7M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($1.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
5
Sole-source
84%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KJBPJDNGRLK7
Parent company
CATERPILLAR INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CATERPILLAR INC company family: 3 registered entities, $190.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CATERPILLAR INCIRVING, TX · Family page
    $188.3M
  2. CATERPILLAR, INCCHILLICOTHE, IL
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2017
  2. 1.9MFY2018
  3. 1.7MFY2019
  4. 2.7MFY2020
  5. 1.7MFY2021
  6. 1.9MFY2022
  7. 3.1MFY2023
  8. 2.4MFY2024
  9. 3.3MFY2025
  10. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$1.1M58%
  2. Construction & real property$498.5K26%
  3. Facilities & utilities$306.8K16%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition84%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards84%
    US 30% · $1.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 3, 2022 – Dec 19, 2025· N6247322C4401
  2. Public Buildings Service· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Aug 21, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· 47PM0625C0001
  3. Department of the Navy· Prince George's County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Jul 1, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· N4008025F1057
  4. Department of the Navy· Charles County, MD· Facilities & utilities· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· N4008026F1152
  5. Agricultural Research Service· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 6, 2024 – Mar 2, 2026· 12505B24P0217

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$4.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 3.7MFY2021
  2. 800KFY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. -0.5FY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.5M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KINGSPORT, TN · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $1.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

92 companies · $43.9M reported

  1. FAIRFIELD, OH · 4 subawards · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  2. PISCATAWAY, NJ · 7 subawards · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
  3. OMAHA, NE · 4 subawards · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Primes that pay it

21 companies · $365.6M reported

  1. OSHKOSH, WI · 1,137 subawards · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 2 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 5 subawards · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 54 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMERICAN MATERIAL HANDLING, INC.$255.2M−38% in FY2026
    WATKINSVILLE, GA · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingFederal Acquisition Service · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing+6 more
  2. JCB INC.$247.4M−23% in FY2026
    POOLER, GA · 14% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  3. TAYLOR DEFENSE PRODUCTS, LLC$158.8M+82% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, MS · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CATERPILLAR INC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CATERPILLAR INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$5.4M
13 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$17.6M
$17.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$730.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$4.8M
    13 reports
  2. 2024$4.5M
    12 reports
  3. 2025$5.4M
    13 reports
  4. 2026$2.8M
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code30 reports
  2. Trade (domestic and foreign)19 reports
  3. Copyright, patent and trademark18 reports
  4. Energy and nuclear17 reports
  5. Transportation15 reports
  6. Trucking and shipping12 reports
  7. Education9 reports
  8. Miscellaneous tariff bills9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES33 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE33 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Duberstein Group Inc.$1.4M
    14 reports
  2. The Washington Tax & Public Policy Group$600K
    14 reports
  3. AUSTIN LEGAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS PLLC$90K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$530.5K73%
  2. Democratic$196.5K27%
  3. Other or none$3,5000.5%

PACs sponsored

  • CATERPILLAR INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CATPAC)$1.3M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.