Federal contractor · LUBBOCK, TX

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM received $3.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+961% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $25.4M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($2.7M). It also received $107.5M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$3.2M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.7%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EGLKRQ5JBCZ7
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 817.4KFY2017
  2. 1.1MFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 5.3MFY2020
  5. 2.7MFY2021
  6. 5.8MFY2022
  7. 2.5MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 298.8KFY2025
  10. 3.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$3.2M99%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$22.8K0.7%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.6%
    US 39% · $19.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.7%
    US 30% · $22.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$3,141
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Lubbock County, TX· Research & development· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 80MSFC26C0011
  2. Office of Procurement Operations· Lubbock County, TX· Research & development· Jun 13, 2024 – Aug 5, 2026· 70RSAT24CB0000003
  3. Department of the Army· Lubbock County, TX· Research & development· Sep 28, 2020 – Jun 8, 2026· W912HQ20C0031
  4. Department of the Army· Lubbock County, TX· Research & development· Aug 19, 2022 – Jun 10, 2026· W912HQ22C0078
  5. Department of the Army· Lubbock County, TX· Research & development· Feb 8, 2024 – Feb 2, 2026· W912HQ24C0031
  6. Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 20, 2022 – Jan 7, 2026· W56HZV22CL025
  7. Agricultural Research Service· Lubbock County, TX· Professional services· Jan 31, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· 12405B24P0057
  8. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Lubbock County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 12639526P0232

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM received $107.5M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 547 actions (66 new awards), −20% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($74.9M).

Assistance · FY2026
$107.5M
New awards
66
Actions
547
Since FY2021
$694.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 155.9MFY2021
  2. 65.7MFY2022
  3. 109.7MFY2023
  4. 122.2MFY2024
  5. 133.7MFY2025
  6. 107.5MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$78.1M73%
  2. Grants$28.6M27%
  3. Other assistance$879.1K0.8%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$74.9M70%
  2. 47.041 · Engineering$3.7M3.5%
  3. 10.310 · Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI)$2.9M2.7%
  4. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$2.7M2.5%
  5. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$2M1.9%
  6. 93.600 · Head Start$1.9M1.8%
  7. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$1.7M1.6%
  8. 93.866 · Aging Research$1.7M1.5%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Agriculture
  3. Department of Health and Human Services
  4. Department of Agriculture
  5. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 7, 2025 – Sep 19, 2026· P063P252328
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 14, 2024 – Jul 6, 2026· P063P242328
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 23, 2023 – Jul 6, 2026· P063P232328
  4. 47.041 · Engineering· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Aug 9, 2022 – Aug 26, 2026· 2133576
  5. 47.070 · Computer and Information Science and Engineering· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Jun 25, 2024 – Jul 11, 2026· 2404438
  6. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Sep 16, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· W911NF2420208

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $3.3M (29 subawards)

25 sub-recipients

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward
  2. HUNTINGTON, WV · 1 subaward
  3. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 2 subawards
  4. TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward
  5. NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward
  6. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward
  7. PULLMAN, WA · 1 subaward
  8. CANYON, TX · 2 subawards
  9. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 2 subawards
  10. MIAMI, FL · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.7M (12 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $3.7M (21 subawards)

23 primes

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 8 subawards
  2. AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards
  3. NORMAN, OK · 2 subawards
  4. ARLINGTON, TX · 1 subaward
  5. EMORY UNIVERSITY$251.8K3.9%
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  6. STORRS, CT · 1 subaward
  7. AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL · 2 subawards
  8. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 1 subaward
  9. OLATHE, KS · 1 subaward
  10. CLEVELAND, OH · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4.3M paid out · $8.3M received
  • FY2022: $7.4M paid out · $13.2M received
  • FY2023: $11.4M paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2024: $9.5M paid out · $11.7M received
  • FY2025: $7.3M paid out · $11.4M received
  • FY2026: $3.3M paid out · $6.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

114 companies · $43.3M reported

  1. LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  3. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 22 subawards

Primes that pay it

101 companies · $57.7M reported

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 10 subawards
  2. FREDERICK, MD · 20 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT$3.1M
    AUSTIN, TX · 15 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLOUDSCI LLC$3.2M+57% in FY2026
    FORT COLLINS, CO · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. YANK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$5.8M+52% in FY2026
    BROOKLYN, NY · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. ADVANCED RESEARCH, INC.$5.5M+226% in FY2026
    BOZEMAN, MT · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Texas Tech University SystemAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$660K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$160K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid14 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations13 reports
  3. Defense9 reports
  4. Transportation5 reports
  5. Health issues4 reports
  6. Homeland security3 reports
  7. Science and technology2 reports
  8. Agriculture1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC$660K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.