Federal contractor · COLLEGE STA, TX

TEXAS A&M UNIV CYCLOTRON INS

TEXAS A&M UNIV CYCLOTRON INS received $210K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($99.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$210K
New awards
9
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
P4NXMC1R9HL3
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 371.6KFY2017
  2. 162.4KFY2018
  3. 333.5KFY2019
  4. 319.1KFY2020
  5. 337.4KFY2021
  6. 245KFY2022
  7. 325.7KFY2023
  8. 157.5KFY2024
  9. 331.2KFY2025
  10. 210KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$99.6K47%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$92.4K44%
    5 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$18K8.6%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$117.6K56%
  2. Research & development$92.4K44%

Where the work was performed

  1. Brazos County, TX$192K91%
  2. Prince George's County, MD$18K8.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $210K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $210K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$99.6K
    Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$92.4K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$18K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. TAMU BPA CYCLOTRON BEAM ION IRRADIATION EXPERIMENT TESTING$56K
    Department of the Air Force· Brazos County, TX· Research & development· Apr 8, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· FA945326FX016
  2. TAMU BPA CALL #5 1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 05 DEC 2025 - 30 DEC 2025 2. TOTAL ORDER VALUE: THE TOTAL ORDER VALUE IS $44,800.00. 3. TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED: THE TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED WAS FUNDED IN A NOT TO EXCEED FUNDED AMOUNT OF $44,800.00.$44.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Brazos County, TX· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· FA945326FX004
  3. TAMU BPA CALL #4 1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 09 AUG 2025 - 30 SEP 2025 2. TOTAL ORDER VALUE: THE TOTAL ORDER VALUE IS $47,600.00. 3. TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED: THE TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED WAS FUNDED IN A NOT TO EXCEED FUNDED AMOUNT OF $47,600.00.$44.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Brazos County, TX· Research & development· Jul 24, 2025 – May 21, 2026· FA945325FX028
  4. TAMU BPA CALL #3 1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 07 APRIL 2025 - 30 JUNE 20252. TOTAL ORDER VALUE: THE TOTAL ORDER VALUE IS $47,600.00 3. TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED: THE TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED WAS FUNDED IN A NOT TO EXCEED FUNDED AMOUNT OF $47,600.00.$44.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Brazos County, TX· Research & development· Mar 20, 2025 – May 14, 2026· FA945325FX020
  5. TAMU BPA CALL #2 1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 05 DEC 2024 - 30 DEC, 20242. TOTAL ORDER VALUE: THE TOTAL ORDER VALUE IS $47,600.00. 3. TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED: THE TOTAL AMOUNT OBLIGATED WAS FUNDED IN A NOT TO EXCEED FUNDED AMOUNT OF $47,600.$44.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Brazos County, TX· Research & development· Dec 5, 2024 – May 4, 2026· FA945325FX008
  6. 56 HOURS CYCLOTRON BEAM TIME AT TAMU$42K
    Department of the Navy· Brazos County, TX· Professional services· Apr 20, 2026 – May 28, 2026· N0016426FG039
  7. CYCLOTRON BEAM FACILITIES SERVICE$33.6K
    Department of the Navy· Brazos County, TX· Professional services· Oct 9, 2025 – Oct 9, 2025· N0016426FG003
  8. CYCLOTRON BEAM FACILITIES SERVICE FOR ORGANIZATION CR-GXM FY: 2025, AMS: N00164-25-SIMACQ-CR-GXM-0103$24K
    Department of the Navy· Brazos County, TX· Professional services· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· N0016426FG038

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $543.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $196.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $83.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $75.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $899K reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$532K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$165.3K
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 3 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.$75.6K
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FIRETROL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC$364.4K−98% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PERIGEE PRIME AE SB JV LLC$414.6K
    WEST JORDAN, UT · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WSP-MH JV$444.5K
    WASHINGTON, DC · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.