Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

CHUGACH TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC

CHUGACH TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC received $36.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 37 awards (−55% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $697.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($21M).

Obligations · FY2026
$36.9M
New awards
37
Sole-source
11%
Single offer
23%
UEI
LG4AXJ2HMHN3
Parent company
CHUGACH TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 17 registered entities, $134M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $3.6M
  2. $38.5M
  3. $27.6M
  4. $25.5M
  5. $1.9M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 50.4KFY2018
  2. 8.9MFY2019
  3. 49.5MFY2020
  4. 105.3MFY2021
  5. 106.5MFY2022
  6. 144.3MFY2023
  7. 163MFY2024
  8. 82.8MFY2025
  9. 36.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 22 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$20.1M54%
  2. Professional services$11.3M31%
  3. IT & telecom$5.5M15%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition34%
    US 39% · $12.6M
  • Sole-source awards11%
    US 30% · $4.2M
  • Single-offer competitions23%
    US 8.8% · $8.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Apr 30, 2021 – May 27, 2026· N6523621F3024
  2. Agency for International Development· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 20, 2023 – Jul 24, 2026· 7200AA23M00005
  3. Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Aug 28, 2020 – Dec 2, 2025· W52P1J20C0040
  4. Department of the Navy· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 22, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· N6523622F0744
  5. LABOR$14.8M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 26, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· N6523623F0718
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Jun 5, 2023 – Jun 25, 2026· 70Z03823FE0000051
  7. Department of the Army· Cobb County, GA· IT & telecom· Jul 5, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W912DY22C0024
  8. U.S. Coast Guard· Lafourche Parish, LA· Professional services· Jan 4, 2023 – Mar 13, 2026· 70Z02323FFRCP0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $523.3K (7 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. MIL-SAT LLC$158.2K30%
    SURRY, VA · 1 subaward
  2. ROUND ROCK, TX · 1 subaward
  3. COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward
  4. NORFOLK, VA · 1 subaward
  5. NANOOSE BAY, BC · 1 subaward
  6. VERNON HILLS, IL · 1 subaward
  7. ANAHEIM, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 1.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $9.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $10.4M paid out · $83.7K received
  • FY2023: $48.2M paid out · $810.1K received
  • FY2024: $19.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $25.9M paid out · $233.8K received
  • FY2026: $523.3K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

374 companies · $272.7M reported

  1. ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LOUISVILLE, KY · 1 subaward · Technical and trade schools
  3. ANAHEIM, CA · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $56.4M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. FREMONT, OH · 16 subawards
  3. PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.