Federal contractor · JACKSONVILLE, FL

UNITED SITE SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC

UNITED SITE SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC received $1,500 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2019: $885.2K. Its largest customer was Federal Emergency Management Agency ($1,500).

Obligations · FY2026
$1,500
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F2UHLJ6JPFJ5
Parent company
WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN ASA
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLC company family: 11 registered entities, $49.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLCCHARLOTTE, NC · Family page
    $46.1M
  2. $1.1M
  3. $951.7K
  4. PROMARK TECHNOLOGY INCANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    $593.6K
  5. AMERICAN & EFIRD LLCMOUNT HOLLY, NC
    $592K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 41.9KFY2019
  2. 42.1KFY2020
  3. 0FY2022
  4. 649.9KFY2023
  5. 176.6KFY2024
  6. -26.7KFY2025
  7. 1.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$76.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1,500
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $76.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$75.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Emergency Management Agency· Taylor County, FL· Construction & real property· Oct 23, 2025 – Apr 24, 2026· 70FBR426P00000004
  2. Federal Emergency Management Agency· DeKalb County, GA· Equipment maintenance· Feb 4, 2023 – Mar 5, 2026· 70FBR423P00000074

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

38 companies · $124.4M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 129 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 143 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 49 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. 3M COMPANY$231.7M−56% in FY2026
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 16 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric mills
  2. EL PASO, TX · 7.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric millsDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 2 entities · 6.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric millsDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.