Federal contractor · WAUKESHA, WI

WAUKESHA BEARINGS CORPORATION

WAUKESHA BEARINGS CORPORATION received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 60 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $20.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
60
Sole-source
19%
Single offer
68%
UEI
GZ57A195G7K6
Parent company
DOVER CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. WAUKESHA BEARINGS CORPORATIONWAUKESHA, WI · Family page
    $1.9M
  2. ESPY LLCAUSTIN, TX
    $523.1K
  3. $255.6K
  4. $26.5K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 3MFY2018
  3. 3.1MFY2019
  4. 857.6KFY2020
  5. 2.5MFY2021
  6. 865.8KFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 2.6MFY2024
  9. 2.2MFY2025
  10. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 52 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1.1M59%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$762.9K41%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition87%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards19%
    US 30% · $355.8K
  • Single-offer competitions68%
    US 8.7% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 11 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· May 8, 2025 – Dec 3, 2025· SPE4A625PP918
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 16, 2026 – Jan 16, 2026· SPE7L126P3449
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· SPE7L326P2873
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 16, 2026 – Jan 16, 2026· SPE7L126C0043
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 8, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· SPE7L526P0117
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Waukesha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 28, 2026 – Jan 28, 2026· SPE7L126P3751
  7. Defense Logistics Agency· Langlade County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 28, 2026 – Jan 28, 2026· SPE4A626PD950
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Langlade County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 5, 2026 – Jan 5, 2026· SPE4A626PB157

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $33M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 32 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GREENVILLE, TX · 35 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 25 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 36 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TORK SYSTEMS INC$6.9M−26% in FY2026
    ALAMEDA, CA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Ship and boat building+2 more
  2. AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO$2.7M−72% in FY2026
    GARDEN GROVE, CA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other miscellaneous manufacturing+1 more
  3. AURORA, IL · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.