Federal contractor · TULSA, OK

CHEROKEE NATION INTEGRATED HEALTH, L.L.C.

CHEROKEE NATION INTEGRATED HEALTH, L.L.C. received $56.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 36 awards (+34% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $167.6M. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($17.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$56.3M
New awards
36
Sole-source
79%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UJJVZKS13H49
Parent company
CHEROKEE NATION
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C.. company family: 36 registered entities, $513.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $1.3M
  2. $122.4M
  3. $84.3M
  4. $36.5M
  5. $35.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6MFY2021
  2. 6.7MFY2022
  3. 15.3MFY2023
  4. 45.8MFY2024
  5. 41.9MFY2025
  6. 56.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 11 awards
  3. 13 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$22.8M40%
  2. IT & telecom$19.8M35%
  3. Health & medical$12.2M22%
  4. Facilities & utilities$1.5M2.7%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition79%
    US 39% · $44.3M
  • Sole-source awards79%
    US 30% · $44.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Health and Human Services · 4 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Departmental Offices· Tulsa County, OK· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2024 – Jul 17, 2026· 140D0424C0039
  2. National Park Service· Tulsa County, OK· IT & telecom· Sep 20, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· 140P2124F0276
  3. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 12, 2024 – May 29, 2026· HT942524C0106
  4. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Feb 26, 2025 – Apr 14, 2026· HT942525C0017
  5. Defense Health Agency· Honolulu County, HI· IT & telecom· Feb 11, 2025 – May 18, 2026· HT941025C0002
  6. Department of the Army· Tulsa County, OK· Health & medical· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· W81K0426FA219
  7. Defense Health Agency· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Aug 31, 2023 – Apr 23, 2026· HT942523C0084
  8. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Health & medical· Sep 29, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· W91YTZ23C0014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $7.2M (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 13% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $133K paid out · $15.6M received
  • FY2023: $1M paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $10.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $3.9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $7.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

338 companies · $1.5B reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$185.6M
    BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward · Community food and housing, and emergency and other relief services
  2. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLAHOMA$150.6M
    TAHLEQUAH, OK · 145 subawards
  3. GDH CONSULTING INC$83.3M
    TULSA, OK · 4 subawards · Office administrative services

Primes that pay it

32 companies · $65.7M reported

  1. TULSA, OK · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  2. BETHESDA, MD · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TAMPA, FL · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 180 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TETRA TECH, INC.$2.3B−53% in FY2026
    PASADENA, CA · 95 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+8 more
  2. RELIANCE TEST & TECHNOLOGY, LLC$587.7M−25% in FY2026
    CRESTVIEW, FL · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CREDENCE DYNAMO SOLUTIONS LLC$367.2M−26% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C.. (36 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Cherokee NationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.1M
20 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.4M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$360K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$360K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$1.1M
    20 reports
  4. 2026$600K
    9 reports

Top issues

  1. Indian and Native American affairs26 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES26 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE26 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. Steptoe LLP$640K
    6 reports
  3. RAGNAR GROUP LLC$480K
    6 reports
  4. DiNino Associates, LLC$0
    15 reports
  5. JENNER & BLOCK LLP$0
    12 reports
  6. Venable LLP$0
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.