Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
CHUGACH CONSOLIDATED SOLUTIONS, LLC
CHUGACH CONSOLIDATED SOLUTIONS, LLC received $25.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 55 awards (−67% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $341.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($14.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $25.5M
- New awards
- 55
- Sole-source
- 1.6%
- Single offer
- 34%
- UEI
- HME6LMM16LA1
- Parent company
- CHUGACH ALASKA CORPORATION
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 17 registered entities, $134.1M in FY2026 together. See the family
- WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$3.6M
- CHUGACH DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK$38.6M
- CHUGACH TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK$36.9M
- CHUGACH TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK$27.6M
- CHUGACH PACIFIC SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK$1.9M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.2MFY2017
- 2.3MFY2018
- 25.5MFY2019
- 25.6MFY2020
- 44.9MFY2021
- 30MFY2022
- 36.5MFY2023
- 71.5MFY2024
- 77.8MFY2025
- 25.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$14.3M56%34 awards
- Department of the Navy$11.1M44%19 awards
- Federal Bureau of Investigation$97.7K0.4%1 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$15M59%
- Facilities & utilities$10.4M41%
- Professional services$97.7K0.4%
Where the work was performed
- Morris County, NJ$13.9M55%
- San Diego County, CA$11.2M44%
- Norfolk city, VA$307.6K1.2%
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$111.1K0.4%
- Davis County, UT$40.4K0.2%
- Yuma County, AZ$30.4K0.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition35%US 39% · $9M
- Sole-source awards1.6%US 30% · $405.2K
- Single-offer competitions34%US 8.7% · $8.6M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2020 – Nov 19, 2025· N6247320F4528
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2022 – May 8, 2026· N6247322F4966
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· N6247326F0331
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 13, 2021 – Mar 27, 2026· N6247321F4699
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Aug 30, 2021 – Apr 9, 2026· FA524021F0061
- Department of the Army· Morris County, NJ· Construction & real property· Mar 9, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W15QKN26FA172
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 15, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· N6247325F4462
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $6.3M (20 subawards)
13 sub-recipients
- PACIFIC MAX CORP$1.8M29%TAMUNING, GU · 1 subaward
- REACTION CO$1.1M18%BARRIGADA, GU · 1 subaward
- HOFSCHNEIDER ENGINEERING CORPORATION$962K15%SAIPAN, MP · 7 subawards
- NORTHEAST ROOF MAINTENANCE INC.$935.8K15%PERTH AMBOY, NJ · 1 subaward
- GUMA ARCHITECTS LLC$535.3K8.6%AGANA HEIGHTS, GU · 1 subaward
- PACIFIC METAL WORKS CORPORATION$195.9K3.1%BARRIGADA, GU · 1 subaward
- MORGAN SITE CONTRACTORS, LLC$155.8K2.5%MILFORD, PA · 1 subaward
- PLANATE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC$140K2.2%ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards
- ENCORE HOLDINGS LLC$135.2K2.2%PAWTUCKET, RI · 1 subaward
- INTERNATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGY, LLC$94.6K1.5%HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Its reported sub-contracts equal 25% of its FY2026 contract obligations.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $12.2M paid out · $0 received
- FY2022: $16.3M paid out · $0 received
- FY2023: $8.4M paid out · $0 received
- FY2024: $14.9M paid out · $1.4M received
- FY2025: $19.7M paid out · $0 received
- FY2026: $6.3M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
377 companies · $275.5M reported
- ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ARBOR E & T LLC$21.5MLOUISVILLE, KY · 1 subaward · Technical and trade schools
- RGB SYSTEMS, INC$18.6MANAHEIM, CA · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
8 companies · $56.4M reported
- INDYNE, INC.$40.5MCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
- SIERRA LOBO INC$13MFREMONT, OH · 16 subawards
- PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026HONOLULU, HI · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$367M−60% in FY2026LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.