Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

CHUGACH TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

CHUGACH TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC received $27.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+55% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $197.2M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management ($27.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$27.6M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E917S8KAV9C8
Parent company
CHUGACH ALASKA CORPORATION
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 17 registered entities, $134M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $3.6M
  2. CHUGACH DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $38.5M
  3. CHUGACH TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $36.9M
  4. CHUGACH CONSOLIDATED SOLUTIONS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $25.5M
  5. CHUGACH PACIFIC SOLUTIONS LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $1.9M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5MFY2018
  2. 18.4MFY2019
  3. 31.1MFY2020
  4. 16.5MFY2021
  5. 24.6MFY2022
  6. 23.8MFY2023
  7. 34.9MFY2024
  8. 17.8MFY2025
  9. 27.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management$27.6M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$27.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cuyahoga County, OH$13M47%
  2. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK$9.4M34%
  3. Harrison County, MS$5.2M19%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CLEVELAND JCC WITH OA/CTS$37.3M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Cuyahoga County, OH· Education & social services· Sep 28, 2023 – Aug 4, 2026· 1605JW23C0008
  2. GULFPORT JOB CORPS CENTER OPERATIONS WITH OUTREACH&ADMISSIONS AND CAREER TRANSITION SERVICES$35.7M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Harrison County, MS· Education & social services· Sep 30, 2020 – Jun 29, 2026· 1605JE20C0003
  3. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR THE OPERATION OF ALASKA JOB CORPS CENTER WITH OUTREACH & ADMISSIONS AND CAREER TRANSITION SERVICES.$28.3M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK· Education & social services· Dec 5, 2023 – Aug 5, 2026· 1605JW24C0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $377.4K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. KABO HEALTH LLC$377.4K100%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 1.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $268.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $910.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $691.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $21.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $377.4K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

377 companies · $275.5M reported

  1. RAVENTEK SOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC$23.8M
    ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ARBOR E & T LLC$21.5M
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 1 subaward · Technical and trade schools
  3. RGB SYSTEMS, INC$18.6M
    ANAHEIM, CA · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $56.4M reported

  1. INDYNE, INC.$40.5M
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. SIERRA LOBO INC$13M
    FREMONT, OH · 16 subawards
  3. READINESS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT LC$1.4M
    PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$367M−60% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.