Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

KUTTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

No contract obligations recorded for KUTTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $17.9M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
K7F2J2K5V4F7
Parent company
SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION
Other than small businessWoman-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC company family: 18 registered entities, $2.3B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLCSPARKS, NV · Family page
    $295.6M
  2. $2B
  3. SIERRA SPACE CORPLOUISVILLE, CO
    $10.9M
  4. $7.2M
  5. $5.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -2.6KFY2017
  2. 2.7MFY2018
  3. 5.4MFY2019
  4. 2.8MFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 1.5MFY2022
  7. 1.5MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 615.7KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for KUTTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $30.3M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $32.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $34.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $18.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $459K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $30.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,028 companies · $3.1B reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 121 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. CREATION TECHNOLOGIES WASHINGTON LLC$171.2M
    EVERETT, WA · 92 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 87 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

40 companies · $562.3M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 77 subawards · Other support services
  2. RESTON, VA · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GREENVILLE, TX · 154 entities · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  2. KONGSBERG, NOR · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. THE MITRE CORPORATION$5.7B−14% in FY2026
    MC LEAN, VA · 3 entities · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC (18 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • SIERRA SPACE CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$510K
27 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$4M
$4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$290.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.3M
    26 reports
  2. 2024$1.8M
    33 reports
  3. 2025$510K
    27 reports
  4. 2026$500K
    16 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense74 reports
  2. Aerospace46 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations11 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code10 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear4 reports
  6. Homeland security3 reports
  7. Aviation, aircraft and airlines2 reports
  8. Computer industry2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES98 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE96 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC$840K
    14 reports
  2. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$700K
    14 reports
  3. Icebreaker Strategies, LLC$380K
    7 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$300K
    6 reports
  5. Meeks, Butera & Israel PLLC$220K
    14 reports
  6. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP$180K
    2 reports
  7. Atlantic Strategies Group LLC$140K
    9 reports
  8. Covington & Burling LLP$100K
    2 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$224K77%
  2. Democratic$62.5K22%
  3. Other or none$4,0001.4%

PACs sponsored

  • SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$306.4K raised this cycle
  • SIERRA SPACE CORPORATION PAC$3,470 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.