Federal contractor · VALENCIA, CA

L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received -$111.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $60.1M. Its largest customer was Defense Contract Management Agency (-$36.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$111.4K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CKVATCP8BKQ3
Parent company
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. company family: 154 registered entities, $6.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.GREENVILLE, TX · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. HARRIS CORPORATIONPOTTSTOWN, PA
    $1B
  3. L3HARRIS GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.ROCHESTER, NY
    $460.4M
  4. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $380.7M
  5. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.WACO, TX
    $377.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.6MFY2017
  2. 22.9MFY2018
  3. 15.4MFY2019
  4. 11MFY2020
  5. 4.2MFY2021
  6. -665.1KFY2022
  7. -2.1MFY2023
  8. -77.4KFY2024
  9. -931.2KFY2025
  10. -111.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency-$36.4K0.0%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy-$75K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. SUPPORT SERVICES INCLUDING ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL, DEPOT OPERATIONS, LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FOR TB 23 CONTRACT.$4.8M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 26, 2019 – Jan 14, 2026· N6660419FG810
  2. BATTERY ASSY$0
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 13, 2022 – Jan 20, 2026· N0038322P008M

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,936 companies · $39.2T reported

  1. CPI RADANT TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION INC.$39.2T
    STOW, MA · 63 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. USA MACHINE INC.$3.9B
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$188.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 268 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

121 companies · $33.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$16.4B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3,138 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.6B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 622 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$5B
    TUCSON, AZ · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+10 more
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$22.3B−44% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 84 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. (154 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Harris CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Jariet TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • L-3 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • L3 Harris Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • NV5 GeospatialAI match · 99%
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INCAI match · 98%
  • L-3 Harris Technologies Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.1M
38 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$8.8M
$8.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$777.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.9M
    44 reports
  2. 2024$2.3M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$2.1M
    38 reports
  4. 2026$1.5M
    18 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense92 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations58 reports
  3. Science and technology43 reports
  4. Transportation28 reports
  5. Aerospace17 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  7. Intelligence and surveillance14 reports
  8. Natural resources14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES93 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE90 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)43 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)28 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)22 reports
  6. Natl Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)21 reports
  7. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)18 reports
  8. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)15 reports
  9. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)14 reports
  10. Economic Development Administration14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$700K
    14 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$520K
    12 reports
  3. The McKeon Group, Inc.$360K
    11 reports
  4. The Nickles Group, LLC$350K
    5 reports
  5. Velocity Government Relations, LLC$297.7K
    12 reports
  6. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$210K
    6 reports
  7. BALLARD PARTNERS$190K
    8 reports
  8. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$190K
    4 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$429K55%
  2. Democratic$345.5K44%
  3. Other or none$3,0000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC$1.6M raised this cycle
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC PAC$96.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.