Federal contractor · GAITHERSBURG, MD

LEIDOS, INC.

LEIDOS, INC. received $307.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−27% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3B. Its largest customer was National Science Foundation ($242.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$307.2M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
20%
UEI
X38JVP4R72E1
Parent company
LEIDOS, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LEIDOS, INC. company family: 96 registered entities, $9.8B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA · Family page
    $2.3B
  2. $2.4B
  3. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA
    $1.1B
  4. DYNETICS, INC.HUNTSVILLE, AL
    $1B
  5. LEIDOS, INC.GAITHERSBURG, MD
    $606M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 432.9MFY2017
  2. 735.6MFY2018
  3. 820.6MFY2019
  4. 655.6MFY2020
  5. 539.1MFY2021
  6. 552.7MFY2022
  7. 394.9MFY2023
  8. 394.1MFY2024
  9. 422.6MFY2025
  10. 307.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$242.7M79%
  2. Research & development$62.3M20%
  3. IT & telecom$2.2M0.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$242.7M79%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition20%
    US 39% · $62M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions20%
    US 8.8% · $62M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Science Foundation· Facilities & utilities· Oct 28, 2016 – Sep 23, 2026· NSFDACS1219442
  2. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Nov 26, 2019 – Aug 26, 2026· 693KA720C00002
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 31, 2017 – Jul 27, 2026· GSQ0017AJ0079
  4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services· Baltimore County, MD· IT & telecom· Aug 31, 2018 – Jun 2, 2026· 75FCMC18F0068
  5. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 30, 2017 – Jan 30, 2026· W909MY17F0005
  6. Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Oct 4, 2016 – Feb 18, 2026· HC102813F0255
  7. Defense Threat Reduction Agency· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 17, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· HDTRA125FE010
  8. Internal Revenue Service· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Jul 18, 2018 – Aug 11, 2026· 2032H518F00560

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $35.4M (101 subawards)

63 sub-recipients

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward
  2. TGSUSA, LLC$2.6M7.3%
    VIENNA, VA · 2 subawards
  3. ROCKLEDGE, FL · 1 subaward
  4. AURORA, CO · 7 subawards
  5. SOMERSET, NJ · 3 subawards
  6. EXETER, RI · 5 subawards
  7. EINHORN ENGINEERING PLLC$1.2M3.4%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  8. WESTERVILLE, OH · 3 subawards
  9. GROVE CITY, OH · 1 subaward
  10. ZIEGLER INC$702.1K2.0%
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 12% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $82.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $70M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $113.1M paid out · $45.1K received
  • FY2024: $43.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $31.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $35.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3,379 companies · $13.9B reported

  1. EDGEWOOD, MD · 9 subawards · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. KANSAS CITY, MO · 118 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 540 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

106 companies · $2.9B reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 107 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 260 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 91 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 201 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+13 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+9 more
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physicians

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LEIDOS, INC. (96 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LEIDOS, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.9M
48 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$13.5M
$13.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$858.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.5M
    39 reports
  2. 2024$3.8M
    40 reports
  3. 2025$4.9M
    48 reports
  4. 2026$2.4M
    23 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense99 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations95 reports
  3. Science and technology41 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code37 reports
  5. Homeland security34 reports
  6. Veterans34 reports
  7. Aerospace27 reports
  8. Energy and nuclear20 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES150 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE144 reports
  3. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)13 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The OB-C Group. LLC$910K
    13 reports
  2. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$820K
    14 reports
  3. CR Federal$570K
    14 reports
  4. Squire Patton Boggs$540K
    6 reports
  5. CGCN GROUP, LLC$510K
    6 reports
  6. American Defense International, Inc.$460K
    14 reports
  7. TEAM HALLAHAN LLC$420K
    14 reports
  8. 535 GROUP, LLC$420K
    14 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$468.5K55%
  2. Democratic$390K45%

PACs sponsored

  • LEIDOS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.