Federal contractor · MEDFORD, NY

MACROLINK, INC.

MACROLINK, INC. received $328.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+4,005% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($328.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$328.4K
New awards
5
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FQGNVX4L1JT7
Parent company
RTX CORP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the RAYTHEON COMPANY company family: 227 registered entities, $25.3B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANYTUCSON, AZ · Family page
    $10.9B
  2. RTX CORPORATIONEAST HARTFORD, CT
    $3.9B
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANYANDOVER, MA
    $3.4B
  4. RAYTHEON COMPANYMARLBOROUGH, MA
    $1.2B
  5. RAYTHEON COMPANYMCKINNEY, TX
    $1.1B

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -4.3KFY2017
  2. 347.9KFY2018
  3. 51.2KFY2019
  4. 104.1KFY2020
  5. 1.3MFY2023
  6. 2.3MFY2024
  7. 8KFY2025
  8. 328.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$328.4K100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$328.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Suffolk County, NY$328.4K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $328.4K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $328.4K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$328.4K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. CONTROL,INTERFACE$1.1M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 20, 2024 – Apr 17, 2026· N0038324CS025
  2. UNIT 8 UNIT 11 POWER SUPPLIES$344.4K
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· N6449826P2030
  3. RECORDER,SIGNAL DAT$138.6K
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 25, 2024 – May 14, 2026· N0038324PS048
  4. RECORDER,SIGNAL DAT$0
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 17, 2024 – Feb 25, 2026· N0038324PS069
  5. RECORDER,SIGNAL DAT$0
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 2, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· N0038325PS051

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.9M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. THE BOEING COMPANY$4.9M99.9%
    RIDLEY PARK, PA · 1 subaward
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$4,0000.1%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $16.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $488.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,985 companies · $42.6B reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$5B
    GREENVILLE, TX · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC$4.3B
    STERLING, VA · 297 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TRIO MANUFACTURING INC$4.3B
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 336 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

164 companies · $36.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$20.2B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 6,713 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC$7B
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 122 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. THE BOEING COMPANY$4.8B
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2,203 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$171.9B−38% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 128 entities · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+13 more
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$74.6B+20% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 99 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+10 more
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+16 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of RAYTHEON COMPANY (227 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • RTX CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Raytheon Technologies (formerly Raytheon Company)AI match · 99%
  • Digital Force Technologies (formerly known as Adelos)AI match · 98%
  • Sparton CorporationAI match · 96%
  • Raytheon Technologies CorporationAI match · 90%
Lobbying · 2025
$13.9M
39 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$47.2M
$47.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.2M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$11.4M
    43 reports
  2. 2024$13.5M
    43 reports
  3. 2025$13.9M
    39 reports
  4. 2026$8.3M
    20 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense117 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations80 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code35 reports
  4. Aerospace29 reports
  5. Aviation, aircraft and airlines26 reports
  6. Transportation19 reports
  7. Homeland security15 reports
  8. Communications, broadcasting, radio and TV14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE130 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES128 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)29 reports
  4. Natl Security Council (NSC)18 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)11 reports
  6. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)9 reports
  7. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)7 reports
  8. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)6 reports
  9. Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)4 reports
  10. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$880K
    14 reports
  2. Invariant LLC$760K
    12 reports
  3. S-3 Group$640K
    10 reports
  4. Forbes-Tate$570K
    10 reports
  5. DLA Piper LLP (US)$390K
    8 reports
  6. Vantage Point Strategies LLC$260K
    13 reports
  7. Thorn Run Partners$260K
    7 reports
  8. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$240K
    6 reports

22 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$591K51%
  2. Democratic$559K48%
  3. Other or none$6,0000.5%

PACs sponsored

  • EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2.4M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.