Federal contractor · ORCHARD PARK, NY

MISSION SYSTEMS ORCHARD PARK INC

MISSION SYSTEMS ORCHARD PARK INC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $100.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($629.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
10
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JAGFLJSK5229
Parent company
AI CONVOY TOPCO & CY S.C.A.
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.5MFY2017
  2. 17.5MFY2018
  3. 17.4MFY2019
  4. 8.4MFY2020
  5. 6.5MFY2021
  6. 7.6MFY2022
  7. 10.8MFY2023
  8. 10MFY2024
  9. 6.7MFY2025
  10. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$629.5K52%
    5 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$240.1K20%
    3 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$198.4K16%
    1 awards
  4. U.S. Special Operations Command$142.4K12%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$827.9K68%
  2. Equipment maintenance$391.9K32%

Where the work was performed

  1. Erie County, NY$943.4K78%
  2. Cumberland County, NC$142.4K12%
  3. Kern County, CA$124.6K10%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$629.5K
    Department of Defense · 4 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$240.1K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$198.4K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U2 LIFE SUPPORT OXYGEN SYSTEMS$7.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Erie County, NY· Professional services· Sep 26, 2024 – Mar 24, 2026· FA852824F0019
  2. SUSTAINMENT TO PROVIDE SUPPLIES AND SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE U-2 LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM.$2.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Erie County, NY· Equipment maintenance· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· FA852826FB009
  3. MILITARY FREEFALL LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS$464.6K
    Department of the Army· Erie County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· W911QY26FA132
  4. POM TEST STAND CALIBRATION AND TRAINING$283.1K
    U.S. Special Operations Command· Cumberland County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Dec 23, 2024 – Jan 16, 2026· H9223925P0003
  5. MASK STAND PURCHASE$198.4K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Erie County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 21, 2026 – Aug 21, 2026· 80NSSC26P1400
  6. T-7 AIRCREW BREATHING SYSTEMS$124.6K
    Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· FA930226P0025
  7. INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT$66.7K
    Department of the Army· Erie County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 29, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· W911QY26PA011
  8. MILITARY FREEFALL LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS$61.1K
    Department of the Army· Erie County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 30, 2026 – Mar 30, 2026· W911QY26FA071

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.9M (6 subawards)

4 primes

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$1.3M69%
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards
  2. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$302K16%
    AMITYVILLE, NY · 1 subaward
  3. JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC.$151.9K7.9%
    TULLAHOMA, TN · 2 subawards
  4. BOEING COMPANY, THE$141.8K7.4%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $336.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $44.4M received
  • FY2023: $39.8K paid out · $39M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $50.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $44.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $39.8K reported

  1. SAMTECH AUTOMOTIVE USA, INC.$39.8K
    CARSON, CA · 1 subaward · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $516.8M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$398M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 167 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$49.9M
    YORK, PA · 13 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. THE BOEING COMPANY$44M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 25 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HB&A, LLC$10.6M−89% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SMART MUNITIONS EXPERT SOLUTIONS, INC.$8.1M−41% in FY2026
    DUNMORE, PA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CEMS-RS&H USAF JV$7.7M−17% in FY2026
    SUMMERVILLE, SC · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.