Federal contractor · AMITYVILLE, NY

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $37.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 63 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $612.9M. Its largest customer was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($17.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$37.3M
New awards
63
Sole-source
98%
Single offer
2.7%
UEI
CN7PNYLZLNV3
Parent company
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. company family: 154 registered entities, $6.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.GREENVILLE, TX · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. HARRIS CORPORATIONPOTTSTOWN, PA
    $1B
  3. L3HARRIS GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.ROCHESTER, NY
    $460.4M
  4. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $380.7M
  5. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.WACO, TX
    $377.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 78.6MFY2017
  2. 69.3MFY2018
  3. 67.9MFY2019
  4. 98.8MFY2020
  5. 52.3MFY2021
  6. 41.2MFY2022
  7. 70.5MFY2023
  8. 30.7MFY2024
  9. 66.4MFY2025
  10. 37.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$17.6M47%
    2 awards
  2. U.S. Coast Guard$12.6M34%
    9 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$3.7M10%
    17 awards
  4. Defense Logistics Agency$3.5M9.3%
    32 awards
  5. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    2 awards
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency-$169.9K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$32.7M88%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$3.4M9.1%
  3. Equipment maintenance$1.1M3.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Suffolk County, NY$25.1M67%
  2. Pasquotank County, NC$11.5M31%
  3. Polk County, FL$556.6K1.5%
  4. Nassau County, NY$106.5K0.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $37.4M
  • Sole-source awards98%
    US 30% · $36.4M
  • Single-offer competitions2.7%
    US 8.7% · $991.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$17.6M
    Department of Commerce · 2 awards
  2. U.S. Coast Guard$12.6M
    Department of Homeland Security · 5 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$3.7M
    Department of Defense · 5 awards
  4. Defense Logistics Agency$2.6M
    Department of Defense · 14 awards

Largest awards

  1. BRU-55A/A AIRCRAFT BOMB EJECTOR RACK$68.7M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 17, 2017 – Mar 10, 2026· N0001917C0029
  2. 35 P-8A BOMB RACK UNITS(BRU) 75A AND 76A (13 UNITED STATES NAVY (USN), 7 UNITED KINGDOM (UK), 5 NORWAY, 4 NEW ZEALAND (NZ) AND 6 REPUBLIC OF KOREA (ROK)$40.2M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 30, 2020 – Feb 10, 2026· N0001920C0056
  3. ALT-161 BAND 4-8 COUNTERMEASURE RECEIVER PRODUCTION UNITS$20.4M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 30, 2021 – Apr 29, 2026· SPRWA121F0067
  4. NOAA/OMAO/PIAD_THE PURCHASE OF THE AN/APY-11 RADAR SYSTEM, KNOWN AS THE MULTI-MODE RADAR (MMR) SYSTEM FOR C130J AIRCRAFT$17.1M
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Feb 20, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· 1305M226F0077
  5. DO#6$11.5M
    U.S. Coast Guard· Pasquotank County, NC· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 6, 2025· 70Z02326F93110002
  6. P-8A SONOBUOY ROTARY LAUNCHER RETROFIT$11.4M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 30, 2021 – Jan 28, 2026· N0001921F0847
  7. P-8A SONOBUOY ROTARY LAUNCHER LOWER TRAY RETROFIT$4.8M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 4, 2024 – Apr 3, 2026· N0001924F0146
  8. BOMB RACK UNIT 14"-$2.6M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 13, 2024 – Apr 17, 2026· N0038324FVC0E

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $18.1M (23 subawards)

13 sub-recipients

  1. ELTA SYSTEMS LTD$15.1M83%
    ASHDOD, ISR · 7 subawards
  2. SYMETRICS INDUSTRIES, LLC$1.4M7.5%
    MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward
  3. CUBITEK, INC$571.2K3.2%
    BRENTWOOD, NY · 2 subawards
  4. MARKI MICROWAVE LLC$526.7K2.9%
    MORGAN HILL, CA · 1 subaward
  5. ACME INDUSTRIES OF WEST BABYLON INC$461.2K2.5%
    RONKONKOMA, NY · 2 subawards
  6. MISSION SYSTEMS ORCHARD PARK INC$302K1.7%
    ORCHARD PARK, NY · 1 subaward
  7. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$274.8K1.5%
    WOODLAND HILLS, CA · 1 subaward
  8. MINUTEMEN PRECISION MACHINING & TOOL CORP$253.6K1.4%
    RONKONKOMA, NY · 2 subawards
  9. GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC$61.7K0.3%
    RONKONKOMA, NY · 2 subawards
  10. E B INDUSTRIES, LLC$54K0.3%
    FARMINGDALE, NY · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.5M (5 subawards)

4 primes

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$2.6M76%
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards
  2. BOEING COMPANY, THE$547K16%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward
  3. THE BOEING COMPANY$229.4K6.6%
    MESA, AZ · 1 subaward
  4. BOEING COMPANY, THE$51.5K1.5%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 49% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $14.8M paid out · $35.2M received
  • FY2022: $8.5M paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2023: $20.9M paid out · -$1.3M received
  • FY2024: $12.8M paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2025: $7.2M paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2026: $18.1M paid out · $3.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,936 companies · $39.2T reported

  1. CPI RADANT TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION INC.$39.2T
    STOW, MA · 63 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. USA MACHINE INC.$3.9B
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$188.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 268 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

121 companies · $33.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$16.4B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3,138 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.6B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 622 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$5B
    TUCSON, AZ · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+10 more
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$22.3B−44% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 84 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. (154 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Harris CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Jariet TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • L-3 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • L3 Harris Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • NV5 GeospatialAI match · 99%
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INCAI match · 98%
  • L-3 Harris Technologies Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.1M
38 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$8.9M
$8.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$777.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.9M
    44 reports
  2. 2024$2.3M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$2.1M
    38 reports
  4. 2026$1.6M
    19 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense92 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations59 reports
  3. Science and technology44 reports
  4. Transportation28 reports
  5. Aerospace17 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  7. Natural resources15 reports
  8. Intelligence and surveillance14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES94 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE91 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)43 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)29 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)23 reports
  6. Natl Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)22 reports
  7. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)18 reports
  8. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)15 reports
  9. Interior - Dept of (DOI)15 reports
  10. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)15 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$750K
    15 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$520K
    12 reports
  3. The McKeon Group, Inc.$360K
    11 reports
  4. The Nickles Group, LLC$350K
    5 reports
  5. Velocity Government Relations, LLC$297.7K
    12 reports
  6. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$210K
    6 reports
  7. BALLARD PARTNERS$190K
    8 reports
  8. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$190K
    4 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$429K55%
  2. Democratic$345.5K44%
  3. Other or none$3,0000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC$1.6M raised this cycle
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC PAC$96.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.