Federal contractor · MORGANTOWN, WV

NEXTGEN FEDERAL SYSTEMS LLC

NEXTGEN FEDERAL SYSTEMS LLC received $48.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−13% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $312.2M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($15.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$48.2M
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
37%
UEI
N1M7HLLHNSU9
Small businessMinority-ownedHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2017
  2. 8.1MFY2018
  3. 19.1MFY2019
  4. 28.2MFY2020
  5. 20MFY2021
  6. 29.9MFY2022
  7. 45.8MFY2023
  8. 53.4MFY2024
  9. 55.1MFY2025
  10. 48.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection$15.1M31%
    3 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$14.1M29%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$9M19%
    4 awards
  4. U.S. Marshals Service$8.8M18%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Army$663.5K1.4%
    2 awards
  6. Department of the Navy$250K0.5%
    1 awards
  7. Defense Information Systems Agency$245.4K0.5%
    1 awards
  8. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  9. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$40.3M84%
  2. Research & development$5.4M11%
  3. IT & telecom$2.4M5.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Monongalia County, WV$16.4M34%
  2. Harford County, MD$14.1M29%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$13.1M27%
  4. St. Clair County, IL$2.2M4.5%
  5. Norfolk city, VA$2M4.2%
  6. Anne Arundel County, MD$245.4K0.5%
  7. El Paso County, CO$165.2K0.3%
  8. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition37%
    US 39% · $17.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions37%
    US 8.7% · $17.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ASTEROID$56.6M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Jun 29, 2023 – Sep 25, 2026· 47QFCA23F0033
  2. FIELD AND TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES FOR CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTIONS (CBP) AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS (AMO)$53.8M
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2021 – Sep 10, 2026· 70B02C21F00001234
  3. THE C2 PORTFOLIO T&E CONTRACT WILL BE AN OVERARCHING APPROACH FOR FULFILLING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (IV&V) OF SOFTWARE ACROSS THE C2 PORTFOLIO WHICH WILL CONSIST OF FOUR (4) MAJOR PROGRAMS, KNOWN TODAY AS THE GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM-JOINT (GCCS-J), THE GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-JOINT (GCSS-J), THE JOINT PLANNING AND EXECUTION SERVICES (JPES), AND THE GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM-JOINT ENTERPRISE (GCCS-JE). EACH OF THE PROGRAMS DEVELOPS AND SUSTAINS SYSTEMS FOR USE BY THE JOINT COMMUNITIES AND AS SUCH EACH HAS REQUIREMENTS TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY AND VALIDATE SOFTWARE ASSOCIATED WITH THESE SYSTEMS. THE OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS WERE DEVELOPED INDEPENDENTLY OF EACH OTHER AND, AS A RESULT, SOME OF THE FOUNDATIONAL SERVICES THAT SUPPORT EACH SYSTEM ARE DUPLICATIVE. THE C2 PORTFOLIO WILL EVOLVE OVER TIME TO HAVE COMMON MODERNIZED FOUNDATIONAL SERVICES ELIMINATING EXISTING DUPLICATIVE SERVICES. ADDITIONALLY, THE CORE MISSION APPLICATIONS THAT WILL INTERFACE WITH THE COMMON FOUNDATIONAL SERVICES WILL ALSO BE MODERNIZED RESULTING IN THE SUNSET OF SPECIFIC LEGACY COMPONENTS. AS A RESULT, THE C2 CAPABILITIES THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY THIS PWS WILL TRANSITION OVER TIME.$34.9M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Mar 5, 2019 – Jun 11, 2026· HC104719C0005
  4. EO14042 AWARD A BASE YEAR WITH FIVE OPTIONS FOR OST CONTRACTOR SERVICES.$26.5M
    U.S. Marshals Service· Monongalia County, WV· Professional services· Dec 16, 2021 – Sep 22, 2026· 15M10422FA4700005
  5. WEATHER MACHINE LEARNING PLATFORM OPERATIONS (WXMLP OPS)$20.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Monongalia County, WV· Research & development· Sep 22, 2023 – Apr 14, 2026· FA873023CB027
  6. DOMAIN AWARENESS SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES$10.5M
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jun 27, 2023 – Jul 28, 2026· 70B02C23F00000516
  7. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR 618 AOC$8.3M
    Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· Professional services· Jun 20, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA445223F0047
  8. TASK ORDER #4 FOR ENGINEERING OPS SUPPORT.$5.7M
    Department of the Army· Monongalia County, WV· Professional services· Jan 31, 2022 – Apr 22, 2026· W56JSR22F0014

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NEXTGEN FEDERAL SYSTEMS LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$548K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 189.9KFY2022
  2. 225KFY2023
  3. 134KFY2024
  4. -883.5FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $399.4K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC$399.4K100%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $410.4K received
  • FY2022: $4M paid out · $773.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $9.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $19.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $12.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $399.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $4M reported

  1. APPLIED INSIGHT, LLC$3.9M
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ANACONDA, INC$85K
    AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $42.6M reported

  1. J.F. TAYLOR, INC.$13.2M
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 11 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.$10.8M
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$9.9M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 15 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANTA GROUP LLC$75.5M−37% in FY2026
    PURCELLVILLE, VA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PRKK LLC$91.6M−61% in FY2026
    STUART, FL · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP$141.3M+8.6% in FY2026
    JOHNSTOWN, PA · 2 entities · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • NextGen Federal SystemsAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$80K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$0
    4 reports
  3. 2025$0
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense15 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Air Force - Dept of15 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES15 reports
  3. U.S. SENATE15 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Business Group$80K
    10 reports
  2. Mr. Tom Veltri$0
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.