Federal contractor · NEW HUDSON, MI

PRATT & MILLER ENGINEERING & FABRICATION, LLC

PRATT & MILLER ENGINEERING & FABRICATION, LLC received $30.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+144% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $121.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($30.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$30.9M
New awards
8
Sole-source
99%
Single offer
1.1%
UEI
Y1ZSV1VTQH88
Parent company
OSHKOSH CORP
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC company family: 12 registered entities, $865.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLCOSHKOSH, WI · Family page
    $761.2M
  2. PIERCE MANUFACTURING INCAPPLETON, WI
    $72.9M
  3. JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPCHALFONT, PA
    $78.5K
  4. OSHKOSH CORPOSHKOSH, WI
    $7,377
  5. JLG EQUIPMENT SERVICES INCHOUSTON, TX
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.5MFY2017
  2. 4.8MFY2018
  3. 1.1MFY2019
  4. 19.1MFY2020
  5. 2MFY2021
  6. 6.4MFY2022
  7. 5.5MFY2023
  8. 30.5MFY2024
  9. 12.7MFY2025
  10. 30.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$30.6M99%
    5 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$339.6K1.1%
    1 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$29.8M96%
  2. Equipment maintenance$761.8K2.5%
  3. Education & social services$339.6K1.1%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oakland County, MI$30.5M99%
  2. Pima County, AZ$339.6K1.1%
  3. El Paso County, CO$39.4K0.1%
  4. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $30.9M
  • Sole-source awards99%
    US 30% · $30.6M
  • Single-offer competitions1.1%
    US 8.7% · $339.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$30.6M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. FULL RATE PRODUCTION & FIELDING OF TRACKLESS MOVING TARGETS (TMTS) FAMILY OF PRODUCTS (FOPS) FOR NINE CONUS INSTALLATIONS.$62.4M
    Department of the Army· Oakland County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 24, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· W900KK24C0042
  2. ENHANCEMENTS TO THE TRACKLESS MOVING TARGET (TMT) SYSTEM.$7M
    Department of the Army· Oakland County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 27, 2022 – Feb 18, 2026· W900KK22C0046
  3. MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR THE TRACKLESS MOVING TARGET VEHICLE (TMT-V) INTERNAL LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRUS) AND TO PROVIDE HELPDESK FOR THE TMT-INFANTRY AND TMT-VS$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Oakland County, MI· Equipment maintenance· Sep 24, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· W900KK25CA025
  4. NEXT SPACE TECHNOLOGIES FOR EXPLORATION PARTNERSHIP-2 APPENDIX R: LUNAR LOGISTICS & MOBILITY STUDIES. AREAS OF STUDY INCLUDE BUT AREN'T LIMITED TO CONCEPT OF OPS, GROUND SUPPORT EQUIP, LANDER ASSUMPTIONS, PROCUREMENT STRATEGY & LUNAR SURFACE IMPACTS$999.3K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Oakland County, MI· Research & development· Apr 29, 2025 – Jun 26, 2026· 80HQTR25CA007
  5. SBIR PH II$755.9K
    Department of the Army· Oakland County, MI· Research & development· Jun 2, 2020 – Apr 24, 2026· W56HZV20C0009
  6. TRACKLESS MOVING TARGET (TMT) DEPLOYABLE NETWORK ANTENNA; REQUIRED DELIVERY DATE: 15MAY2026$39.4K
    Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Other equipment & supplies· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· W911RZ26PA015
  7. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF246
  8. MOBILE TARGET LIVE FIRE TRAINING$0
    Department of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· Education & social services· Mar 18, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· FA487726F0104

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $451.6K (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $1.9M (1 subaward)

2 primes

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$1.9M81%
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. OSHKOSH DEFENSE, LLC$451.6K19%
    OSHKOSH, WI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $17.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $22.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

491 companies · $3.8B reported

  1. RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS LTD.$248.7M
    HAIFA, ISR · 124 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. THYSSENKRUPP BILSTEIN OF AMERICA INC$229.8M
    HAMILTON, OH · 1,227 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. CATERPILLAR INC$190.5M
    IRVING, TX · 1,137 subawards · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $282.8M reported

  1. AM GENERAL LLC$82.8M
    SOUTH BEND, IN · 1 subaward · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$61.4M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$56.4M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 29 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 89 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AM GENERAL LLC$2.5B−89% in FY2026
    SOUTH BEND, IN · 2 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturingArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing+3 more
  2. AMERICAN RHEINMETALL VEHICLES, LLC$569.2M−40% in FY2026
    AUBURN HILLS, MI · 6 entities · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION$3.3B−42% in FY2026
    OTTAWA, CAN · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • OSHKOSH CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • John Bean Technologies CorporationAI match · 99%
  • John Bean Technologies (JBT) CorporationAI match · 97%
  • Pratt Miller EngineeringAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.5M
18 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.8M
$2.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$160K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$650K
    31 reports
  2. 2024$440K
    14 reports
  3. 2025$1.5M
    18 reports
  4. 2026$1.3M
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense42 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  3. Manufacturing15 reports
  4. Aviation, aircraft and airlines13 reports
  5. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code11 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)11 reports
  7. Postal9 reports
  8. Copyright, patent and trademark6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES64 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE56 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)25 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Other)11 reports
  5. U.S. Postal Service (USPS)5 reports
  6. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)3 reports
  7. Navy - Dept of3 reports
  8. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)3 reports
  9. U.S. Marines3 reports
  10. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Strategic Marketing Innovations$740K
    14 reports
  2. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$670K
    14 reports
  3. S-3 Group$340K
    6 reports
  4. Thorn Run Partners$280K
    7 reports
  5. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$250K
    12 reports
  6. The Doerrer Group LLC$80K
    4 reports
  7. K&L GATES LLP$70K
    4 reports
  8. Harpley CS, LLC$40K
    4 reports

9 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$146K91%
  2. Democratic$14K8.8%

PACs sponsored

  • OSHKOSH CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC (OCEPAC)$177.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.